U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XXVIII— UTE INDIANS OF UTAH: DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS BETWEEN MIXED-BLOOD AND FULL-BLOOD MEMBERS; TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION OVER PROPERTY OF MIXED-BLOOD MEMBERS

25 U.S.C. § 677o

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972). · cites it 3× “§ 16, 25 U. S. C. § 677o. The Secretary of the Interior then was to issue a proclamation “declaring that the Federal trust relationship to such individual is terminated.”
Maldonado v. Hodel, 683 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Utah 1988). · cites it 4× “25 U.S.C. § 677o (a), which requires that those assets not susceptible to fair distribution remain under federal supervision.”
United States v. Felter, 546 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Utah 1982). “25 U.S.C. § 677o (1976). Section 23 of the Act, 25 U.”
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 935 F. Supp. 1473 (D. Utah 1996). “§ 677o, provides that “[w]hen any mixed-blood member of the tribe has received his distributive share of the tribal assets distributed to the mixed-blood group under the provisions of section 677i,” the Secretary of the Interior “is authorized and directed to immediately…”
Ute Distrib. Corp. v. United States, 721 F. Supp. 1202 (D. Utah 1989). “25 U.S.C. § 677o(a) (emphasis added). 6 .”
Hackford v. United States Dep't of Interior (10th Cir. 2026). “’” Id. (quoting 25 U.S.C. § 677v). Upon publication of this proclamation, such [mixed-blood] individual shall not be entitled to any of the services performed for Indians because of his status as an Indian.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 677o(a) — 4 cases
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972). “§ 16, 25 U. S. C. § 677o. The Secretary of the Interior then was to issue a proclamation “declaring that the Federal trust relationship to such individual is terminated.”
Maldonado v. Hodel, 683 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Utah 1988). “25 U.S.C. § 677o (a), which requires that those assets not susceptible to fair distribution remain under federal supervision.”
Ute Distrib. Corp. v. United States, 721 F. Supp. 1202 (D. Utah 1989). “25 U.S.C. § 677o(a) (emphasis added). 6 .”
Hackford v. United States Dep't of Interior (10th Cir. 2026). “’” Id. (quoting 25 U.S.C. § 677v). Upon publication of this proclamation, such [mixed-blood] individual shall not be entitled to any of the services performed for Indians because of his status as an Indian.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.