25 U.S.C. § 711e
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1978–2002 · leading case: City of Lincoln v. United States Dep't of Interior, 229 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (D. Or. 2002).
City of Lincoln v. United States Dep't of Interior, 229 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (D. Or. 2002). “2(f) but rather Interior’s conclusions about how § 711e affects applications by the Tribe under acquisition regulations; that the Tribe has asserted this claim throughout the proceedings and in any event, exhaustion is not required; and that the BIA has failed to comply with the…”
John Mark Latender v. Thomas Israel, Warden, 584 F.2d 817 (7th Cir. 1978). “1415 (1977), which expressly continued state criminal jurisdiction over the tribe, 25 U.S. C.A. § 711e(c)(3) (1978 Supp.), but also from the fact that most tribes that were subjected to state criminal jurisdiction by virtue of § 1162 were never terminated.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 711e(c)(3) — 1 case
John Mark Latender v. Thomas Israel, Warden, 584 F.2d 817 (7th Cir. 1978). “1415 (1977), which expressly continued state criminal jurisdiction over the tribe, 25 U.S. C.A. § 711e(c)(3) (1978 Supp.), but also from the fact that most tribes that were subjected to state criminal jurisdiction by virtue of § 1162 were never terminated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.