U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XLIII–A— CATAWBA INDIAN TRIBE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; RESTORATION OF FEDERAL TRUST RELATIONSHIP

25 U.S.C. § 941m

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: Catawba Indian Tribe v. State, 642 S.E.2d 751 (S.C. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Catawba Indian Tribe v. State, 642 S.E.2d 751 (S.C. 2007). · cites it 2× “Respondent also argues because the Federal Act requires the consent of both Respondent and the State to amend the terms of the Settlement Agreement and State Act, any subsequent state legislative enactments are not applicable to Respondent unless Respondent consents to the…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 941m(f) — 1 case
Catawba Indian Tribe v. State, 642 S.E.2d 751 (S.C. 2007). “Respondent also argues because the Federal Act requires the consent of both Respondent and the State to amend the terms of the Settlement Agreement and State Act, any subsequent state legislative enactments are not applicable to Respondent unless Respondent consents to the…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 941m(f)(l) — 1 case
Catawba Indian Tribe v. State, 642 S.E.2d 751 (S.C. 2007). “Respondent also argues because the Federal Act requires the consent of both Respondent and the State to amend the terms of the Settlement Agreement and State Act, any subsequent state legislative enactments are not applicable to Respondent unless Respondent consents to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.