26 U.S.C. § 2046

Disclaimers

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

For provisions relating to the effect of a qualified disclaimer for purposes of this chapter, see section 2518.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Gaughan v. Edward Dittlof Revocable Trust (In Re Costas), 555 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 2009).
Gaughan v. Edward Dittlof Revocable Trust (In Re Costas), 555 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 2009). “See 26 U.S.C. § 2046 . 7 . Although Butner , rather than Drye , provides the proper rule for application in the first instance, it should be noted that Drye may still hold relevance in the bankruptcy context.”
Gaughan v. Edward Dittlof Revocable Trust, 555 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 2009). “See 26 U.S.C. § 2046 . 7 . Although Butner , rather than Drye , provides the proper rule for application in the first instance, it should be noted that Drye may still hold relevance in the bankruptcy context.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.