26 U.S.C. § 2046
Disclaimers
For provisions relating to the effect of a qualified disclaimer for purposes of this chapter, see section 2518.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Gaughan v. Edward Dittlof Revocable Trust (In Re Costas), 555 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 2009).
Gaughan v. Edward Dittlof Revocable Trust (In Re Costas), 555 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 2009). “See 26 U.S.C. § 2046 . 7 . Although Butner , rather than Drye , provides the proper rule for application in the first instance, it should be noted that Drye may still hold relevance in the bankruptcy context.”
Gaughan v. Edward Dittlof Revocable Trust, 555 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 2009). “See 26 U.S.C. § 2046 . 7 . Although Butner , rather than Drye , provides the proper rule for application in the first instance, it should be noted that Drye may still hold relevance in the bankruptcy context.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.