Notes of Decisions
Auto. Club of Mich. v. Comm'r, 353 U.S. 180 (1957).
· cites it 3× “Where before the expiration of the time prescribed in section 275 for the assessment of the tax, both the Commissioner and the taxpayer have consented in writing to its assessment after such time, the tax may be assessed at any time prior to the expiration of the period agreed…”
Howell v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 175 F.2d 240 (6th Cir. 1949).
· cites it 2× “The Tax Court found that § 276(a), 26 U.S.C.A. § 276 (a), controls and permits the assessment or proceeding in court to collect the tax at any time because the returns involved were false and fraudulent and filed with intent to evade the tax.”
United States v. Richard J. Moriarty & Gruber, Moriarty, Fricke & Jaros, 8 F.3d 329 (6th Cir. 1993).
“2d at 587 (quoting 26 U.S.C. § 276 (c) (emphasis added)). In contrast, each of the statutes of limitations which may be applicable to this case provides that an action must be filed “within six years after the right of action accrues,” without setting forth the relevant right of…”
Goe v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 198 F.2d 851 (3d Cir. 1952).
“Code, 26 U.S.C. § 276 (1946 ed.) Throughout the taxable years taxpayer was a salaried employee of National Tube Co.”
United States v. Pfister, 205 F.2d 538 (8th Cir. 1953).
“” Sees ion 276, 26 U.S.C. § 276 , lifts the bar of the statute of limitations in eases of false or fraudulent returns “with intent to evade tax”, and in cases in which the taxpayer and the Commissioner before the expiration of the statutory period have agreed in writing for its…”
Phoenix Coal Co., Inc. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 231 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1956).
“The court held that additional assessments with respect to the disallowance of a carry-back loss from the following year were the only additional assessments for 1947 open to the Commissioner to make under § 276(d), 26 U.S.C. § 276 (d). Thus the conclusion of each of these cases…”
United States v. Wilson, 182 F. Supp. 567 (D.N.J. 1960).
· cites it 2× “The motion presents two questions: (1) Had the statute of limitations prescribed by § 276 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 ( 26 U.S.C. § 276 (c) expired when the present action was instituted? And (2) Is the taxpayer liable to the Government for the tax assessments set forth…”
Aurore B. Benoit, Transferee v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 238 F.2d 485 (1st Cir. 1956).
“87 , 26 U.S.C.A. § 276 , as treasurer of River Mills, extending the statutory period for assessment for each of the taxable years to June 30, 1951 and June 30, 1952, were ineffective and invalid because the decree dissolving River Mills was entered on December 18, 1946, and…”
26 U.S.C. § 276(b): 1 case
26 U.S.C. § 276(c): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.