26 U.S.C. § 547

Deduction for deficiency dividends

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General rule

If a determination (as defined in subsection (c)) with respect to a taxpayer establishes liability for personal holding company tax imposed by section 541 (or by a corresponding provision of a prior income tax law) for any taxable year, a deduction shall be allowed to the taxpayer for the amount of deficiency dividends (as defined in subsection (d)) for the purpose of determining the personal holding company tax for such year, but not for the purpose of determining interest, additional amounts, or assessable penalties computed with respect to such personal holding company tax.

(b) Rules for application of section(1) Allowance of deduction

The deficiency dividend deduction shall be allowed as of the date the claim for the deficiency dividend deduction is filed.

(2) Credit or refund

If the allowance of a deficiency dividend deduction results in an overpayment of personal holding company tax for any taxable year, credit or refund with respect to such overpayment shall be made as if on the date of the determination 2 years remained before the expiration of the period of limitation on the filing of claim for refund for the taxable year to which the overpayment relates. No interest shall be allowed on a credit or refund arising from the application of this section.

(c) DeterminationFor purposes of this section, the term “determination” means—(1) a decision by the Tax Court or a judgment, decree, or other order by any court of competent jurisdiction, which has become final;(2) a closing agreement made under section 7121; or(3) under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, an agreement signed by the Secretary and by, or on behalf of, the taxpayer relating to the liability of such taxpayer for personal holding company tax.(d) Deficiency dividends(1) Definition

For purposes of this section, the term “deficiency dividends” means the amount of the dividends paid by the corporation on or after the date of the determination and before filing claim under subsection (e), which would have been includible in the computation of the deduction for dividends paid under section 561 for the taxable year with respect to which the liability for personal holding company tax exists, if distributed during such taxable year. No dividends shall be considered as deficiency dividends for purposes of subsection (a) unless distributed within 90 days after the determination.

(2) Effect on dividends paid deduction(A) For taxable year in which paid

Deficiency dividends paid in any taxable year (to the extent of the portion thereof taken into account under subsection (a) in determining personal holding company tax) shall not be included in the amount of dividends paid for such year for purposes of computing the dividends paid deduction for such year and succeeding years.

(B) For prior taxable year

Deficiency dividends paid in any taxable year (to the extent of the portion thereof taken into account under subsection (a) in determining personal holding company tax) shall not be allowed for purposes of section 563(b) in the computation of the dividends paid deduction for the taxable year preceding the taxable year in which paid.

(e) Claim required

No deficiency dividend deduction shall be allowed under subsection (a) unless (under regulations prescribed by the Secretary) claim therefor is filed within 120 days after the determination.

(f) Suspension of statute of limitations and stay of collection(1) Suspension of running of statute

If the corporation files a claim, as provided in subsection (e), the running of the statute of limitations provided in section 6501 on the making of assessments, and the bringing of distraint or a proceeding in court for collection, in respect of the deficiency and all interest, additional amounts, or assessable penalties, shall be suspended for a period of 2 years after the date of the determination.

(2) Stay of collectionIn the case of any deficiency with respect to the tax imposed by section 541 established by a determination under this section—(A) the collection of the deficiency and all interest, additional amounts, and assessable penalties shall, except in cases of jeopardy, be stayed until the expiration of 120 days after the date of the determination, and(B) if claim for deficiency dividend deduction is filed under subsection (e), the collection of such part of the deficiency as is not reduced by the deduction for deficiency dividends provided in subsection (a) shall be stayed until the date the claim is disallowed (in whole or in part) and if disallowed in part collection shall be made only with respect to the part disallowed.No distraint or proceeding in court shall be begun for the collection of an amount the collection of which is stayed under subparagraph (A) or (B) during the period for which the collection of such amount is stayed.(g) Deduction denied in case of fraud, etc.

No deficiency dividend deduction shall be allowed under subsection (a) if the determination contains a finding that any part of the deficiency is due to fraud with intent to evade tax, or to wilful failure to file an income tax return within the time prescribed by law or prescribed by the Secretary in pursuance of law.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 191; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§ 1901(a)(78), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1777, 1834.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1976—Subsecs. (c)(3), (e), (g). Pub. L. 94–455, § 1906(b)(13)(A), struck out “or his delegate” after “Secretary” wherever appearing.

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 94–455, § 1901(a)(78), struck out subsec. (h) relating to the effective date of provisions concerning deduction of deficiency dividends.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by section 1901(a)(78) of Pub. L. 94–455 applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 1901(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1971–2010 · leading case: Fulman v. United States, 434 U.S. 528 (1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fulman v. United States, 434 U.S. 528 (1978). · cites it 2× “87, 91 (1959), this rule of construction does not apply to the personal holding company tax since any penalty can be easily avoided by followingas petitioners' predecessor didthe guidelines set out in 26 U. S. C. § 547 . [9] Petitioners also argue that the valuation standard…”

Nestlé Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm'r, 594 F.3d 968 (8th Cir. 2010). “See 26 U.S.C. §§ 547 , 564, 565, 860, 4981, 4982.”

J.H. Rutter Rex Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 853 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1988). “These cases recognized the potential inequity of their holding to taxpayers. But the critical point is that "Congress has provided certain relief measures that greatly mollify any hardship that a proper application of accrual principles may produce in this context.”

Lx Cattle Co. v. United States, 629 F.2d 1096 (5th Cir. 1980). “Moreover, we note that Congress has provided certain relief measures that greatly mollify any hardship that a proper application of accrual principles may produce in this context.”

Buder v. United States, 332 F. Supp. 345 (E.D. Mo. 1971). · cites it 2× “50 represented *347 a deficiency dividend authorized by 26 U.S.C. § 547 (a). The case was submitted to the court upon the following stipulated facts: 1.”

Kluger Assocs., Inc. v. Comm'r, 617 F.2d 323 (2d Cir. 1980). “26 U.S.C. § 547 . Moreover, the increased capital gains taxes, while not available as deductions under 26 U.”

In Re Dickson, 114 B.R. 740 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). · cites it 2× “” The Trustee proposes that this plan is not tax-qualified because “there is no provision for payment after the death of the participant” as required by 26 U.S.C. § 547 (d)(2)(B)(i)(II) as amended effective January 1, 1989, see Trustee’s brief pp.”

C. Blake McDowell Inc. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 652 F.2d 606 (6th Cir. 1980). “It thereafter filed a claim under 26 U.S.C. § 547 for a deficiency dividend deduction of $106,781.”

Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. CIR (8th Cir. 2010). “See 26 U.S.C. §§ 547 , 564, 565, 860, 4981, 4982.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.