26 U.S.C. § 6330

Notice and opportunity for hearing before levy

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Requirement of notice before levy(1) In general

No levy may be made on any property or right to property of any person unless the Secretary has notified such person in writing of their right to a hearing under this section before such levy is made. Such notice shall be required only once for the taxable period to which the unpaid tax specified in paragraph (3)(A) relates.

(2) Time and method for noticeThe notice required under paragraph (1) shall be—(A) given in person;(B) left at the dwelling or usual place of business of such person; or(C) sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to such person’s last known address;not less than 30 days before the day of the first levy with respect to the amount of the unpaid tax for the taxable period.(3) Information included with noticeThe notice required under paragraph (1) shall include in simple and nontechnical terms—(A) the amount of unpaid tax;(B) the right of the person to request a hearing during the 30-day period under paragraph (2); and(C) the proposed action by the Secretary and the rights of the person with respect to such action, including a brief statement which sets forth—(i) the provisions of this title relating to levy and sale of property;(ii) the procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property under this title;(iii) the administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with respect to such levy and sale and the procedures relating to such appeals;(iv) the alternatives available to taxpayers which could prevent levy on property (including installment agreements under section 6159); and(v) the provisions of this title and procedures relating to redemption of property and release of liens on property.(b) Right to fair hearing(1) In general

If the person requests a hearing in writing under subsection (a)(3)(B) and states the grounds for the requested hearing, such hearing shall be held by the Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals.

(2) One hearing per period

A person shall be entitled to only one hearing under this section with respect to the taxable period to which the unpaid tax specified in subsection (a)(3)(A) relates.

(3) Impartial officer

The hearing under this subsection shall be conducted by an officer or employee who has had no prior involvement with respect to the unpaid tax specified in subsection (a)(3)(A) before the first hearing under this section or section 6320. A taxpayer may waive the requirement of this paragraph.

(c) Matters considered at hearingIn the case of any hearing conducted under this section—(1) Requirement of investigation

The appeals officer shall at the hearing obtain verification from the Secretary that the requirements of any applicable law or administrative procedure have been met.

(2) Issues at hearing(A) In generalThe person may raise at the hearing any relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax or the proposed levy, including—(i) appropriate spousal defenses;(ii) challenges to the appropriateness of collection actions; and(iii) offers of collection alternatives, which may include the posting of a bond, the substitution of other assets, an installment agreement, or an offer-in-compromise.(B) Underlying liability

The person may also raise at the hearing challenges to the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability for any tax period if the person did not receive any statutory notice of deficiency for such tax liability or did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such tax liability.

(3) Basis for the determinationThe determination by an appeals officer under this subsection shall take into consideration—(A) the verification presented under paragraph (1);(B) the issues raised under paragraph (2); and(C) whether any proposed collection action balances the need for the efficient collection of taxes with the legitimate concern of the person that any collection action be no more intrusive than necessary.(4) Certain issues precludedAn issue may not be raised at the hearing if—(A)(i) the issue was raised and considered at a previous hearing under section 6320 or in any other previous administrative or judicial proceeding; and(ii) the person seeking to raise the issue participated meaningfully in such hearing or proceeding;(B) the issue meets the requirement of clause (i) or (ii) of section 6702(b)(2)(A); or(C) a final determination has been made with respect to such issue in a proceeding brought under subchapter C of chapter 63.This paragraph shall not apply to any issue with respect to which subsection (d)(3)(B) applies.(d) Proceeding after hearing(1) Petition for review by Tax Court

The person may, within 30 days of a determination under this section, petition the Tax Court for review of such determination (and the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction with respect to such matter).

(2) Suspension of running of period for filing petition in title 11 cases

In the case of a person who is prohibited by reason of a case under title 11, United States Code, from filing a petition under paragraph (1) with respect to a determination under this section, the running of the period prescribed by such subsection for filing such a petition with respect to such determination shall be suspended for the period during which the person is so prohibited from filing such a petition, and for 30 days thereafter.

(3) Jurisdiction retained at IRS Independent Office of AppealsThe Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals shall retain jurisdiction with respect to any determination made under this section, including subsequent hearings requested by the person who requested the original hearing on issues regarding—(A) collection actions taken or proposed with respect to such determination; and(B) after the person has exhausted all administrative remedies, a change in circumstances with respect to such person which affects such determination.(e) Suspension of collections and statute of limitations(1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), if a hearing is requested under subsection (a)(3)(B), the levy actions which are the subject of the requested hearing and the running of any period of limitations under section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), or section 6532 (relating to other suits) shall be suspended for the period during which such hearing, and appeals therein, are pending. In no event shall any such period expire before the 90th day after the day on which there is a final determination in such hearing. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 7421(a), the beginning of a levy or proceeding during the time the suspension under this paragraph is in force may be enjoined by a proceeding in the proper court, including the Tax Court. The Tax Court shall have no jurisdiction under this paragraph to enjoin any action or proceeding unless a timely appeal has been filed under subsection (d)(1) and then only in respect of the unpaid tax or proposed levy to which the determination being appealed relates.

(2) Levy upon appeal

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a levy action while an appeal is pending if the underlying tax liability is not at issue in the appeal and the court determines that the Secretary has shown good cause not to suspend the levy.

(f) ExceptionsIf—(1) the Secretary has made a finding under the last sentence of section 6331(a) that the collection of tax is in jeopardy,(2) the Secretary has served a levy on a State to collect a Federal tax liability from a State tax refund,(3) the Secretary has served a disqualified employment tax levy, or(4) the Secretary has served a Federal contractor levy,this section shall not apply, except that the taxpayer shall be given the opportunity for the hearing described in this section within a reasonable period of time after the levy.(g) Frivolous requests for hearing, etc.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if the Secretary determines that any portion of a request for a hearing under this section or section 6320 meets the requirement of clause (i) or (ii) of section 6702(b)(2)(A), then the Secretary may treat such portion as if it were never submitted and such portion shall not be subject to any further administrative or judicial review.

(h) Definitions related to exceptionsFor purposes of subsection (f)—(1) Disqualified employment tax levy

A disqualified employment tax levy is any levy in connection with the collection of employment taxes for any taxable period if the person subject to the levy (or any predecessor thereof) requested a hearing under this section with respect to unpaid employment taxes arising in the most recent 2-year period before the beginning of the taxable period with respect to which the levy is served. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “employment taxes” means any taxes under chapter 21, 22, 23, or 24.

(2) Federal contractor levy

A Federal contractor levy is any levy if the person whose property is subject to the levy (or any predecessor thereof) is a Federal contractor.

(Added Pub. L. 105–206, title III, § 3401(b), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 747; amended Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(7) [title III, § 313(b)(2)(A), (d)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–642, 2763A–643; Pub. L. 109–280, title VIII, § 855(a), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 1019; Pub. L. 109–432, div. A, title IV, § 407(b), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 2961; Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, § 8243(a), (b), May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 200; Pub. L. 111–240, title II, § 2104(a)–(c), Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2565; Pub. L. 114–74, title XI, § 1101(d), Nov. 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 637; Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, § 424(b)(1), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3124; Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, § 401(a)(281), (282), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1197; Pub. L. 116–25, title I, § 1001(b)(1)(C), (3), July 1, 2019, 133 Stat. 985.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2019—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 116–25, § 1001(b)(1)(C), substituted “Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals” for “Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals”.

Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 116–25 inserted “Independent” after “IRS” in heading and substituted “Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals” for “Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals” in introductory provisions.

2018—Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 115–141, § 401(a)(281), substituted “subsection (d)(3)(B)” for “subsection (d)(2)(B)” in concluding provisions.

Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 115–141, § 401(a)(282), substituted “thereafter.” for “thereafter, and”.

2015—Subsec. (c)(4)(C). Pub. L. 114–74 added subpar. (C).

Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 114–113, § 424(b)(1)(A), (B), substituted “Petition for review by Tax Court” for “Judicial review of determination” in heading and “petition the Tax Court for review of such determination” for “appeal such determination to the Tax Court” in text.

Subsec. (d)(2), (3). Pub. L. 114–113, § 424(b)(1)(C), (D), added par. (2) and redesignated former par. (2) as (3).

2010—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 111–240, § 2104(c), substituted “Exceptions” for “Jeopardy and State refund collection” in heading.

Subsec. (f)(4). Pub. L. 111–240, § 2104(a), added par. (4).

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 111–240, § 2104(b), substituted “Definitions related to exceptions” for “Disqualified employment tax levy” in heading, inserted introductory provisions and par. (1) designation and heading, substituted “A disqualified employment tax levy is” for “For purposes of subsection (f), a disqualified employment tax levy is”, and added par. (2).

2007—Subsec. (f)(3). Pub. L. 110–28, § 8243(a), added par. (3).

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 110–28, § 8243(b), added subsec. (h).

2006—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 109–432, § 407(b)(3), substituted “in writing under subsection (a)(3)(B) and states the grounds for the requested hearing” for “under subsection (a)(3)(B)”.

Subsec. (c)(4)(A), (B). Pub. L. 109–432, § 407(b)(2), redesignated subpars. (A) and (B) as cls. (i) and (ii), respectively, of subpar. (A), in cl. (ii) substituted “; or” for period at end, and added subpar. (B).

Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 109–280, § 855(a), reenacted heading without change and amended text of par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The person may, within 30 days of a determination under this section, appeal such determination—

“(A) to the Tax Court (and the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction with respect to such matter); or

“(B) if the Tax Court does not have jurisdiction of the underlying tax liability, to a district court of the United States.

If a court determines that the appeal was to an incorrect court, a person shall have 30 days after the court determination to file such appeal with the correct court.”

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 109–432, § 407(b)(1), added subsec. (g).

2000—Subsec. (d)(1)(A). Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(7) [title III, § 313(d)], substituted “with respect to” for “to hear”.

Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(7) [title III, § 313(b)(2)(A)], inserted at end “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 7421(a), the beginning of a levy or proceeding during the time the suspension under this paragraph is in force may be enjoined by a proceeding in the proper court, including the Tax Court. The Tax Court shall have no jurisdiction under this paragraph to enjoin any action or proceeding unless a timely appeal has been filed under subsection (d)(1) and then only in respect of the unpaid tax or proposed levy to which the determination being appealed relates.”

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2015 Amendment

Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, § 424(b)(2), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3124, provided that: “The amendments made by this subsection [amending this section] shall apply to petitions filed under section 6330 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 18, 2015].”

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–74 applicable to returns filed for partnership taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, with certain exceptions, see section 1101(g) of Pub. L. 114–74, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6221 of this title.

Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–240, title II, § 2104(d), Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2565, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to levies issued after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 27, 2010].”

Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, § 8243(c), May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 200, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to levies served on or after the date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [May 25, 2007].”

Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–432 applicable to submissions made and issues raised after the date on which the Secretary first prescribes a list under section 6702(c) of this title, see section 407(f) of Pub. L. 109–432, set out as a note under section 6320 of this title.

Pub. L. 109–280, title VIII, § 855(b), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 1019, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to determinations made after the date which is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 17, 2006].”

Effective Date of 2000 Amendment

Amendment by section 1(a)(7) [title III, § 313(b)(2)(A)] of Pub. L. 106–554 effective Dec. 21, 2000, and amendment by section 1(a)(7) [title III, § 313(d)] of Pub. L. 106–554, effective as if included in the provisions of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105–206, to which such amendment relates, see section 1(a)(7) [title III, § 313(f)] of Pub. L. 106–554, set out as a note under section 6015 of this title.

Effective Date

Section applicable to collection actions initiated after the date which is 180 days after July 22, 1998, see section 3401(d) of Pub. L. 105–206, set out as a note under section 6320 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 506 cases (60 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: Olsen v. United States, 414 F.3d 144 (1st Cir. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Olsen v. United States, 414 F.3d 144 (1st Cir. 2005). · cites it 13× “Given in accordance with 26 U.S.C. § 6330 (a), the notice indicated that Olsen owed about $105,000 in unpaid employment taxes, penalties, and interest for the wages of employees of Interactive Arts, Inc.”

Keller Tank Servs. II, Inc. v. Comm'r, 854 F.3d 1178 (10th Cir. 2017). · cites it 10× “26 U.S.C. § 6330 . • Tax Court: a specialized court established by Congress under Article I of the • Constitution to conduct prepayment judicial review of deficiencies.”

Est. of Robert C. Duncan v. CIR, 890 F.3d 192 (5th Cir. 2018). · cites it 7× “2 26 U.S.C. § 6330 (c)(1). 3 Rodriguez v. Comm'r , 722 F.”

Cropper v. Comm'r, 826 F.3d 1280 (10th Cir. 2016). · cites it 5× “6330 -l(e)(3), Q & A (E8); see also 26 U.S.C. § 6330 (d)(1) (permitting taxpayer to petition Tax Court for review “within 30 days of a [Notice of] determination”).”

James M. Robinette v. Comm'r of the Internal Revenue Serv., 439 F.3d 455 (8th Cir. 2006). · cites it 5× “See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6330 , 6331. Robinette filed a petition for review in the United States Tax Court, and the Tax Court agreed with Robinette that the IRS had abused its discretion in imposing the levy.”

Dudley's Com. & Indus. Coating, Inc. v. United States Internal Revenue Serv., 292 F. Supp. 2d 976 (M.D. Tenn. 2003). · cites it 17× “(“Dudley’s”), filed this action pursuant to the tax collection due process provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 6330 against the Defendant. United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).”

Murphy v. Comm'r of IRS, 469 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2006). · cites it 3× “See 26 U.S.C. § 6330 . In July 2002, the IRS assigned Murphy’s case to an appeals officer.”

Christopher Iames v. Comm'r of I.R.S., 850 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2017). · cites it 9× “26 U.S.C. § 6330 ; see Goza v. Comm’r, 114 T.”

Living Care Alternatives of Utica, Inc. v. United States of Am., Internal Revenue Serv., 411 F.3d 621 (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 6× “§ 6320 (b); 26 U.S.C. § 6330 (b). Proceedings are informal and may be conducted via correspondence, over the phone or face to face.”

Medlock v. United States, 325 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (C.D. Cal. 2003). · cites it 19× “Appeals Officer Rich is an impartial officer pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6330 (b)(3), who had no prior involvement with respect to Medlock’s subject tax liabilities before she handled the CDP Appeal.”

Gillum v. Comm'r, 676 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2012). · cites it 16× “On October 26, 2006, the IRS sent Gillum a "Final Notice[:] Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing" under 26 U.S.C. § 6330 to collect Gillum's unpaid tax liabilities for 1996-2003.”

Thomas W. Roberts v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 329 F.3d 1224 (11th Cir. 2003). · cites it 4× “26 U.S.C. § 6330 (a)-(d); see also Goza v.”

Show all 506 citing cases →

— 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c)(2)(B) — 1 case

Christopher Iames v. Comm'r of I.R.S., 850 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2017). “26 U.S.C. § 6330 ; see Goza v. Comm’r, 114 T.”

— 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c)(3) — 2 cases

Alvin Kanofsky v. Comm'r of Internal Reven, 424 F. App'x 189 (3rd Cir. 2011).

Ruggiero v. United States, 242 F.R.D. 437 (N.D. Ill. 2007).

— 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d) — 1 case

Michael Brown v. Cir (9th Cir. 2024).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.