26 U.S.C. § 9001
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2024 · leading case: Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). “[] The Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act (Fund Act), 26 U. S. C. § 9001 et seq., offers the Presidential candidates of major political parties the option of receiving public financing for their general election campaigns.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994). “, whereas chapters 95 and 96 specifically govern the administration of funds for Presidential election campaigns and the payment of matching funds for Presidential primary campaigns, see 26 U. S. C. § 9001 et seq. (Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act), 26 U.”
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “95 of Subtitle H of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9001 , et seq. (“Fund Act”) and the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.”
Greenberg v. Bolger, 497 F. Supp. 756 (E.D.N.Y 1980). “Unlike the Campaign Fund Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9001 et seq., the 1978 and 1980 Acts make no provision for reimbursement based on the returns in the present presidential election.”
Wertheimer v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 268 F.3d 1070 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “26 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq. (2000). . 2 U.S.”
Corren v. Condos, 898 F.3d 209 (2d Cir. 2018). “497 (1971) (codified as amended at 26 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq. ) (the "Fund Act"), established a public election financing system for presidential candidates.”
Reagan Bush Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 525 F. Supp. 1330 (D.D.C. 1981). “, and the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act (PECFA), 26 U.S.C. §§ 9001 et seq. Complaint, ¶¶ 2, 3.”
Molinari v. Powers, 82 F. Supp. 2d 57 (E.D.N.Y 2000). “The majority of those jurisdictions that do not require any signatures permit a presidential candidate to get on the ballot either because he has received substantial media recognition as a serious candidate, because he has qualified for federal matching funds under the…”
Buckley v. Valeo, 387 F. Supp. 135 (D.D.C. 1975). “1263 ; and Subtitle H of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq. (Supp. Ill, 1973), as amended, Pub.”
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 616 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1980). “95 of Subtitle H of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9001 , et aeq. (“Fund Act”) and the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.”
Hooker v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 21 F. App'x 402 (6th Cir. 2001). “, and 26 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq., (the “Acts”) unconstitutional “as they authorize ‘matching funds’ in Presidential elections.”
Common Cause v. Schmitt, 512 F. Supp. 489 (D.D.C. 1980). “26 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq. (1976). 2 . A “political committee” is any committee, association, or organization (whether or not incorporated) which accepts contributions or makes expenditures for the purpose of influencing, or attempting to influence, the nomination or election of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.