27 U.S.C. § 123
Repealed. June 25, 1936, ch. 815, § 9, 49 Stat. 1930
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1931–1937 · leading case: Blumenthal v. United States, 88 F.2d 522 (8th Cir. 1937).
Blumenthal v. United States, 88 F.2d 522 (8th Cir. 1937). “§ 122 ), and the so-called Reed Amendment ( 27 U.S.C.A. § 123 ). McCormick & Co. v. Brown, 286 *526 U.”
Edgmon v. United States, 87 F.2d 13 (10th Cir. 1936). “Edgmon and Denton were convicted and sentenced on an indictment charging a violation of 27 U.S.C.A. § 123 ( 48 Stat. 316 , § 12) 1 and have appealed.”
McCormick & Co. v. Brown, 52 F.2d 934 (4th Cir. 1931). “us to the complainants wMeh he threatens to take, The right o£ the state to exercise a measure of control over the interstate commerce m intoxicating liquor within its borders is conceded by complainants, by reason of the provisions of the Wilson Act of August 8, 1890 (27 USCA §…”
McCormick & Co. v. Brown, 58 F.2d 994 (S.D.W. Va 1931). “The right of the state to exercise a meastire of control over the interstate commerce in intoxicating liquor within its borders is conceded by complainants, by reason of the provisions of the Wilson Act of August 8, 1890 (27 USCA § 121), the Webb-Kenyon Act of March 1,1913 (27…”
Premier-Pabst Sales Corp. v. Grosscup, 12 F. Supp. 970 (E.D. Pa. 1935). “§ 122 ), the Reed Amendment ( 27 U.S.C.A. § 123 and note), and, finally,-by the Twenty-First Amendment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.