27 U.S.C. § 63
Repealed. June 19, 1934, ch. 657, § 3, 48 Stat. 1116
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1928–1937 · leading case: Morgenthau v. Mifflin Chem. Corp., 93 F.2d 82 (3rd Cir. 1937).
Morgenthau v. Mifflin Chem. Corp., 93 F.2d 82 (3rd Cir. 1937). “, 27 U.S.C.A. §§ 63 , 71 et seq.; Const.Amend.”
United States v. Anas Chem. Co., 25 F.2d 491 (E.D.N.Y 1928). “thout a permit of the Prohibition Department of the United States, certain specially denatured alcohol, to wit, 6 barrels of specially denatured alcohol, against the peace and dignity of the United States, and contrary to the form of the statute of the United States in such case…”
Helvering v. Druggists' Specialties Co., 76 F.2d 743 (3rd Cir. 1935). “[27 USCA §§ 63, 71 et seq.]), and extended from year to year, authorizing the monthly withdrawal — tax-free—of 4400 wine gallons of specially denatured alcohol, Formula No.”
Allied Drug & Chem. Corp. v. Helvering, 10 F. Supp. 619 (S.D.N.Y. 1935). “[27 USCA §§ 63, 71 et seq.]) does not confer any discretionary power to grant or refuse permits for the use of denatured alcohol for manufacturing purposes; and (e) that title 3 discloses no requirement for the procuring of permits to use specially denatured alcohol for…”
United States v. 5 Drums Containing 250 Gallons of Wood Stain, 41 F.2d 788 (D. Conn. 1930). “By the stipulation it is agreed that the suit is based upon a breach of the provisions of section 593(a) and 593(b) of the Tariff Act of 1922 (19 USCA §§ 496, 497) and title 3 of the Prohibition Act (27 USCA §§ 63, 71-89) and the regulations thereunder.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.