28 U.S.C. § 110
New Jersey
New Jersey constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Camden, Newark and Trenton.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 72
cases (62 in the last 5 years), 1933–2026 · leading case: Ex Parte Collett, 337 U.S. 55 (1949).
Ex Parte Collett, 337 U.S. 55 (1949). “For example, §§ 1394, 1395, 1396 and 1400, respectively, prescribe a new definition of appropriate forums for actions against the Comptroller of the Currency, involving fines and forfeitures, internal revenue taxes and patent and copyright suits; and the following statutes are…”
Joseph Zicarelli v. Albert D. Gray, Jr., Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison, 543 F.2d 466 (3rd Cir. 1976). “28 U.S.C. § 110 (1970). . 456 F.2d 46 (4th Cir.”
Perez v. Decker, 355 F. Supp. 3d 185 (S.D. Ill. 2019). “See 28 U.S.C. § 110 . *187 Petitioner has named as respondents the Field Office Director of the New York Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"), the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the Secretary of the U.”
Wilson v. Awalt, 2 F. Supp. 465 (M.D. Penn. 1933). “Section 49, Judicial Code, 28 USCA § 110, reads as follows: “All proceedings by any national banking association to enjoin the Comptroller of the Currency, under the provisions of any law relating to national banking assoeia *467 tions, shall be had in the district where such…”
O'Conner v. Watson, 81 F.2d 833 (5th Cir. 1936). “” 28 U.S.C.A. § 110 . The suit was to enjoin the Comptroller of the Currency from doing the alleged unlawful act of enforcing an assessment made by him against shareholders of a national bank, which assessment was challenged on the ground that that official was without power to…”
Stein v. Delano, 35 F. Supp. 260 (D.N.J. 1940). “” Section 49 of the Judicial Code, Title 28 U.S.C. § 110 , 28 U.S.C.A. § 110 . The proceedings herein are by persons who happen to be shareholders in a national banking association.”
Abel v. Hellawell, 25 F. Supp. 446 (E.D.N.Y 1938). “” A first reading of this section would seem to indicate that this section does not apply to the present action because it refers to proceedings by any “national banking association.”
Shivananjappa v. Bhayani (S.D.N.Y. 2020). “And she seems to allege that the events that are the basis of her claims occurred in New Jersey, which is within the District of New Jersey, 28 U.S.C. § 110 , and in Brooklyn, within the Eastern District of New York, see § 112(c).”
Moran v. Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Atl. City (E.D.N.Y 2025). “See 28 U.S.C. § 110 . See id. Magistrate Judge Merkl therefore ordered Plaintiffs to show cause by October 16, 2024, “why venue is proper in this district and, if not, whether Plaintiffs object to a transfer of venue and on what grounds.”
Palmer v. United States of Am. (D.N.J. 2021).
Coombs v. United States of Am. (D.N.J. 2021).
TABOADA v. United States (D.N.J. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.