28 U.S.C. § 1293
Repealed. Pub. L. 87–189, § 3, Aug. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 417]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 250
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1950–2022 · leading case: In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. & Louise Higgins, 743 F.2d 984 (3rd Cir. 1984).
In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. & Louise Higgins, 743 F.2d 984 (3rd Cir. 1984). “§ 1291 (general final appeals from district court) and 28 U.S.C. § 1293 (bankruptcy appeals), for an order to be reviewable in this court, it must be “final.”
Nicholas & Virginia Maiorino v. Branford Sav. Bank, 691 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1982). “OAKES, Circuit Judge: This appeal, involving inter alia the state law of Connecticut on strict foreclosures, comes to us without enlightenment from a Connecticut district judge: the parties have agreed to come directly to the court of appeals by virtue of a provision of the new…”
In the Matter of Richard E. BARKER, Debtor-Appellant, 768 F.2d 191 (7th Cir. 1985). “28 U.S.C. § 1293 (b) (1982). Thus, the jurisdictional issue presented here is whether the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision denying the stacking of exemptions is final.”
In the Matter of Unr Indus., Inc., Debtors-Appellants, 725 F.2d 1111 (7th Cir. 1984). “Until then, during the “transition period” as it is called, “the jurisdiction of the district courts, the courts of appeals, and panels of bankruptcy judges to hear appeals shall be the same as the jurisdiction of such courts and panels granted under the amendments [that the new…”
In the Matter of Leslie BOOMGARDEN, Debtor-Appellant, 780 F.2d 657 (7th Cir. 1985). “1984); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1293 (b), we must first determine whether we properly have jurisdiction of this case.”
Robert Ranta v. Thomas Gorman, 721 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2013). “8 The jurisdictional statute at issue in that case was former 28 U.S.C. § 1293 (b), which was replaced by 28 U.”
In Re Am. Mariner Indus., Inc., Debtor. Crocker Nat'l Bank v. Am. Mariner Indus., Inc., Debtor-Appellee, 734 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1984). “1983). In bankruptcy cases the jurisdiction of this court is limited to “all final decisions” of the bankruptcy appellate panels and those exceptional cases set out in 28 U.”
In the Matter of Jonathan Kutner, Debtors. Daniel C. Stewart v. Jonathan Kutner, 656 F.2d 1107 (5th Cir. 1981). “New Title 28 U.S.C. § 1293 (b) is a part of Title II of the new Code.”
United States Dep't of Energy v. West Texas Mktg. Corp., 763 F.2d 1411 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1985). “One court of appeals found: nothing in the 1984 amendments that changes the scheme adopted in 1978____ Compare 28 U.S.C. §§ 1293 (b), 1334(a), (b), added by the 1978 Act, with 28 U.”
Matter of Cash Currency Exch., Inc., Debtors. Cash Currency Exch., Inc. v. Donald C. Shine, Receiver, 762 F.2d 542 (7th Cir. 1985). “28 U.S.C. § 1293 (b). The district courts’ jurisdiction of appeals from decisions of the bankruptcy courts is not so limited.”
In Re Sambo's Restaurants, Inc., a California Corp., Debtor. Sambo's Restaurants, Inc., a California Corp. v. Peggy Wheeler, 754 F.2d 811 (9th Cir. 1985). “Although 28 U.S.C. §§ 1293 and 1334 did not go into effect until April 1, 1984, for cases such as the one before us the appellate jurisdiction of the district courts and the courts of appeals is the same as their jurisdiction under these new provisions.”
In the Matter of Glover, Inc., Debtor. First Bank of Billings, Montana v. Albuquerque Nat'l Bank, 697 F.2d 907 (1st Cir. 1983). “” 28 U.S.C. § 1293 (b) (Supp. II 1978) (emphasis added).”
— 28 U.S.C. § 1293(b) — 2 cases
HealthTrio, Inc. v. Centennial River Corp. (In Re Healthrio, Inc.), 653 F.3d 1154 (10th Cir. 2011).
Growth Realty Companies v. Regency Woods Apts., 686 F.2d 899 (11th Cir. 1982).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.