28 U.S.C. § 1405
Creation or alteration of district or division
Actions or proceedings pending at the time of the creation of a new district or division or transfer of a county or territory from one division or district to another may be tried in the district or division as it existed at the institution of the action or proceeding, or in the district or division so created or to which the county or territory is so transferred as the parties shall agree or the court direct.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1968–2023 · leading case: Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Elec. Corp., 290 F. Supp. 308 (C.D. Cal. 1968).
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Elec. Corp., 290 F. Supp. 308 (C.D. Cal. 1968). “75 ), be and the same is hereby vacated and set aside so that said numbered cases will be and remain pending in the Southern District of California, Central Division ( 28 U.S.C. § 1405 ) as such District and Division existed prior to said Act of March 18, 1966, ( 80 Stat.”
August J.C. Egle v. Ann E. Schraedel Egle, 715 F.2d 999 (5th Cir. 1983). “28 U.S.C. §§ 1405 , 1406, 1631, and 2106.”
Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. Marshall Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 560 F. Supp. 43 (N.D.W. Va. 1983). “Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1405 , this Court has deemed it advisable, so as to prevent any further delay in this already protracted litigation, to retain this case on its docket following the realignment of the federal judicial districts in this State.”
Krick v. Raytheon Co. (D. Mass. 2023). “The United States also argues that the matter should be dismissed and not transferred due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.