28 U.S.C. § 1741
Foreign official documents
An official record or document of a foreign country may be evidenced by a copy, summary, or excerpt authenticated as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1951–2016 · leading case: Sicom S.P.A. v. TRS Inc., 168 F. Supp. 3d 698 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).
Sicom S.P.A. v. TRS Inc., 168 F. Supp. 3d 698 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “The Second Marengo Declaration (if not the First) substantially complies with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1741 .”
United States v. Milan Confesor Rodriguez Serrate, 534 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1976). “He points to 28 U.S.C. § 1741 (1970) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 44(a)(2) 4 as providing the proper avenues for putting into evidence foreign official documents.”
Bokey Est., 194 A.2d 194 (Pa. 1963). “947 , as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1741 and the Pennsylvania Acts of April 27, 1876, P.”
John Zwack, Bela Zwack & Dora Zwack, as Co-Partners Doing Bus. as J. Zwack & Co. v. Kraus Bros. & Co., Inc., 237 F.2d 255 (2d Cir. 1956). “These were certifications by Hungarian officers purporting to show surplus profits tax due from the firm prior to November 1948.”
Shell Pipe Line Corp. v. West Texas Mktg. Corp., 540 F. Supp. 1155 (S.D. Tex. 1982). “ECI’s contention that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the disputed oil on the grounds that the interpleader dispute involves property of the debtor’s (ECI’s) estate, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1741 (e), is premature. Judge Patton rejected this contention in his…”
Keene v. Meese, 619 F. Supp. 1111 (E.D. Cal. 1985). “Plaintiff has introduced into evidence uncontroverted declarations, see 28 U.S.C. § 1741 , that he wishes to acquire and exhibit the three Canadian films as part of his participation in the public debate about appropriate governmental policy respecting nuclear weaponry and…”
Murarka v. Bachrack Bros., Inc, 215 F.2d 547 (2d Cir. 1954). “The requirements for proof of foreign public records contained in 28 U.S.C.A. § 1741 and §§ 329 and 398 of the New York Civil Practice Act have no application here.”
United States v. Elias Ragi Ghaloub, Alias Louis John Ferris, Allias Louis Corey, Alias Nisar John Ferris, 385 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1966). “If otherwise admissible, the census records were properly summarized, evidenced and authenticated under 28 U.S.C. § 1741 and Fed.R. Civ.Pro. 44(a).”
United States v. Terry Joseph Wing, 450 F.2d 806 (9th Cir. 1971). “” 28 U.S.C. § 1741 provides that “an official record * * * of a foreign country may be evidenced by a copy, summary, or excerpt authenticated, [etc.”
Osario v. Harza Eng'g Co., 890 F. Supp. 750 (N.D. Ill. 1995). “In addition, the plaintiffs have failed to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1741 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 44 regarding foreign official records.”
Kathleen Marra Mole v. United States, 315 F.2d 156 (5th Cir. 1963). “Rule 44, like Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1741 provides in substance that copies of an official foreign document or record may be admitted in evidence when certified by the lawful custodian thereof, and authenticated by a certificate of a consular officer of the United States resident…”
Delmore v. Brownell, 135 F. Supp. 470 (D.N.J. 1955). “Introduction was attempted under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1741 : “A copy of any foreign document of record or on file in a public office of a foreign country or political subdivision thereof, certified by the lawful custodian thereof, shall be admissible in evidence when authenticated by a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.