28 U.S.C. § 1911
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court may fix the fees to be charged by its clerk.
The fees of the clerk, cost of serving process, and other necessary disbursements incidental to any case before the court, may be taxed against the litigants as the court directs.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1950–2026 · leading case: Prescott v. UTMB, 73 F.4th 315 (5th Cir. 2023).
Prescott v. UTMB, 73 F.4th 315 (5th Cir. 2023). “See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1911–14. I. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY Prescott was an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice at the time he filed this suit against five UTMB personnel under 42 U.”
Shaw v. Aurgroup Fin. Credit Union, 552 F.3d 447 (6th Cir. 2009). “]; (2) any fee, charge, or amount required under chapter 123 of title 28 [ 28 U.S.C. §§ 1911 et seq.], or by the plan, to be paid before confirmation, has been paid; (3) the plan has been proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law; (4) the value, as of the…”
Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). “In providing procedures to litigate in forma pauperis, Congress created an exception to the general rules under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1911— 14, which impose filing fees on federal court litigants.”
Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719 (11th Cir. 1998). “” 28 U.S.C. § 1911 (1994). 3 . The PLRA, including section 1915(g), applies only to civil cases and does not, for example, apply to habeas corpus proceedings.”
Connor v. Winter, 519 F. Supp. 1337 (S.D. Miss. 1981). “28 U.S.C. §§ 1911 et seq. Finally, the expense items covered by the headings "Express Mail Service," "Supplies," *1352 and "Telephone" are items normally and properly considered overhead, or costs of doing business and must not be allowed.”
In Re Prods. Intern. Co., 395 B.R. 101 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2008). “or (10) nonpayment of any fees or charges required under chapter 123 of title 28 [ 28 U.S.C. §§ 1911 et seq.\ with the current Section 1112(b)(4), which states that "the term 'cause' includes — (A) substantial or continuing loss to or diminution of the estate and the absence of…”
John v. Baker, 982 P.2d 738 (Alaska 1999). “See 28 U.S.C. § 1911 (b) (1994). But unless and until Congress speaks, we are bound by Montana’s “general rule” that " 'the inherent powers of an Indian tribe’ — those powers a tribe enjoys apart from express provision by treaty or statute — ‘do not extend to the activities of…”
Gaudet v. Kirshenbaum Inv. Co. (In Re Gaudet), 132 B.R. 670 (D.R.I. 1991). “ase under this chapter [Chapter 13] to a case under chapter 7 of this title [Title 11], or may dismiss a case under this chapter [Chapter 13], whichever is in the best interests of creditors and the estate, for cause, including— (1) unreasonable delay by the debtor that is…”
In Re Unitcast, Inc., 214 B.R. 992 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1997). “Priorities *999 (a) The following expenses and claims have priority in the following order: (1)First, administrative expenses allowed under § 503(b) of this title, and any fees and charges assessed against the estate under chapter 123 of title 28 [ 28 U.S.C. §§ 1911 et seq.]. 11…”
Rupp v. United States (In Re Rocky Mountain Refractories), 208 B.R. 709 (10th Cir. BAP 1997). “Section 507(a)(1) provides that: (a) The following expenses and claims have priority in the following order: (1) First, administrative expenses allowed under section 503(b) of this title, and any fees and charges assessed against the estate under chapter 123 of title 28 [ 28…”
In Re Hopper, 404 B.R. 302 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2009). “Section 707(a) provides as follows: (a) The court may dismiss a case under this chapter only after notice and a hearing and only for cause, including— (1) unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors; (2) nonpayment of any fees and charges required under…”
In Re P.J. Keating Co., 205 B.R. 663 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1997). “any fees or charges assessed against any of the Debtors under chapter 123 of Title 28, United States Code ( 28 U.S.C. § 1911 , et seq.).” *668 There are several answers to this argument.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.