U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART V— PROCEDURE › Chapter CHAPTER 123— FEES AND COSTS

28 U.S.C. § 1913

Courts of appeals

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

The fees and costs to be charged and collected in each court of appeals shall be prescribed from time to time by the Judicial Conference of the United States. Such fees and costs shall be reasonable and uniform in all the circuits.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 222 cases (128 in the last 5 years), 1952–2026 · leading case: Nat'l Vets. Legal Servs. Prog. v. United States, 291 F. Supp. 3d 123 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Vets. Legal Servs. Prog. v. United States, 291 F. Supp. 3d 123 (D.C. Cir. 2018). · cites it 13× “In this class action, users of the PACER system contend that the fees charged from 2010 to 2016 violated federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1913 note (enacted as § 404 of the Judiciary Appropriations Act, 1991, Pub.”
Hagan v. Rogers, 570 F.3d 146 (3rd Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “Section § 1915(b)(3) thus adopts a sister statute's cap on appellate-docketing fees; 28 U.S.C. § 1913 is that statute. In § 1913, Congress provides that "[t]he fees and costs to be charged and collected in each court of appeals shall be prescribed.”
McLean v. United States, 566 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1913 note ("Court of Appeals Miscellaneous Fee Schedule"), 1914(a).”
Nat'l Vets. Legal Servs. Prog. v. United States, 235 F. Supp. 3d 32 (D.D.C. 2017). · cites it 3× “2899 , 2915 (codified as 28 U.S.C § 1913 note). (Compl. at 2, ECF No.”
United States v. Pilcher, 950 F.3d 39 (2d Cir. 2020). “Charging fees for PACER access is authorized by statute, codified at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1913 , 1914, 1926, 1932 (notes), and has no bearing on the right to gain access to court proceedings and documents.”
Jerardo Rodriguez v. David Cook, Dir., Oregon State Penitentiary, 169 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 1999). “See 28 U.S.C. § 1913 ; Fed. R.App. P. 3(e). An action may proceed despite failure to pay the filing fees only if the party is granted IFP status.”
Nat'l Vets. Legal Servs. Prog. v. United States, 321 F. Supp. 3d 150 (D.C. Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “Plaintiffs are PACER users who contend that the fees charged from 2010 to 2016 exceeded the amount allowed by federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1913 note (enacted as § 404 of the Judiciary Appropriations Act, 1991, Pub.”
Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). “See 28 U.S.C. § 1913 note (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees).”
Joseph H. Norton v. E.U. Dimazana, M.D. Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., 122 F.3d 286 (5th Cir. 1997). “§ 1915 (b)(1)-(2); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1913 note (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees).”
Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719 (11th Cir. 1998). “See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1913 & note (schedule of fees).”
Alley v. Bell, 101 F. Supp. 2d 588 (W.D. Tenn. 2000). · cites it 3× “75 28 U.S.C. § 1913 .142 28 U.S.C. § 1915 .2 28 U.”
Williams v. Miller, 696 F. App'x 862 (10th Cir. 2017). “See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1913 , 1917, However, there is an important exception; we excuse prepayment of fees to prevent forfeiture of potentially meritorious appeals because of a person's impecunious circumstances.”
Show all 222 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.