28 U.S.C. § 3702
Unlawful sports gambling
For information regarding constitutionality of par. (1) of this section, as added by section 2(a) of Pub. L. 102–559, see note under section 3701 of this title.
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Governor of New Jersey, 730 F.3d 208 (3rd Cir. 2013).
Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Governor of New Jersey, 730 F.3d 208 (3rd Cir. 2013). “28 U.S.C. § 3702 . The prohibition on private persons is limited to any such activity conducted “pursuant to the law or compact of a governmental entity,” id.”
Murphy v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Assn., 138 S. Ct. 1461 (2018). “on” competitive sporting events, 28 U. S. C. §3702 (1), and for “a person to sponsor, operate, advertise, or promote” those same gam- bling schemes if done “pursuant to the law or compact of a govern- mental entity,” §3702(2).”
Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Governor of New Jersey, 832 F.3d 389 (3rd Cir. 2016). “28 U.S.C. § 3702 (emphasis added). PASPA defines “governmental entity” to include states and their political subdivisions.”
Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Governor of New Jersey, 799 F.3d 259 (3rd Cir. 2015). “28 U.S.C. § 3702 (emphasis added). PASPA defines “governmental entity” to include states and their political subdivisions.”
Brackeen v. Haaland, 994 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2021). “at 1470 (analyzing only the component of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. § 3702 (1), that prohibits states from “authoriz[ing] by law” sports betting); Printz, 521 U.”
Lange v. Martin, 2016 Ark. 337 (Ark. 2016). “28 U.S.C.A. § 3702 (Westlaw through P.L. 114-222).”
OFC Comm Baseball v. Markell, 579 F.3d 293 (3rd Cir. 2009). “28 U.S.C. § 3702 . The statute contains four exceptions, only one of which is relevant here.”
Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Christie, 61 F. Supp. 3d 488 (D.N.J. 2014). “28 U.S.C. § 3702 . PASPA includes a grandfather clause, which exempts states with preexisting sports wagering laws.”
State of Texas v. USA, 945 F.3d 355 (5th Cir. 2019). “at 1481–84 (considering whether part of 28 U.S.C. § 3702 (1) could be severed from §§ 3701–04).”
City of Phila. v. Sessions, 309 F. Supp. 3d 289 (E.D. Pa. 2018). “28 U.S.C. § 3702 (1). 8 Prior to enacting the law at issue in Murphy , in 2012, New Jersey passed a new law authorizing sports gambling, 2011 N.”
NCAA v. Governor of New Jersey, 939 F.3d 597 (3rd Cir. 2019). “28 U.S.C. § 3702 (emphasis added). At that time and for the following nineteen years, New Jersey law paralleled PASPA, 4 prohibiting sports gambling by its Constitution and by statute.”
State of New York v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 964 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2020). “While PASPA sought to accomplish this goal by providing that states could not “sponsor, operate, advertise, promote, license, or authorize by law or compact” sports betting, 28 U.S.C. § 3702 (1), Section 1373 13 attempts to do so by stripping from state governments the right to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.