28 U.S.C. § 415
Repealed. Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 113, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 29]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1936–1991 · leading case: Ballard v. United States, 329 U.S. 187 (1946).
Ballard v. United States, 329 U.S. 187 (1946). “[3] Judicial Code § 278, 28 U.S.C. § 415 . [4] Judicial Code § 276, 28 U.”
Thiel v. S. Pac. Co., 328 U.S. 217 (1946). “§ 412 ; and citizens cannot be disqualified “on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,” 28 U. S. C. § 415 . In addition, jurors must be returned from such parts of the district as the court may direct “so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial, and so…”
Beckett v. United States, 84 F.2d 731 (6th Cir. 1936). “The appellants wholly failed to produce any substantial evidence to establish a practice of systematic and arbitrary exclusion of negro citizens from jury service.”
Froudi v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 328 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “28 U.S.C. § 415 . Conversely, we would conclude with equal certainty that his Fifth Amendment just compensation claim does not warrant court appointed counsel under 28 U.”
United States v. Shannabarger, 19 F. Supp. 975 (W.D. Mo. 1937). “( 28 U.S.C.A. § 415 ). We are not at all certain that it is not within the authority of a District Court, by rule (and so long a practice as we have here is evidence of a rule), to direct that the name of no mere loafer, no hanger-on about courthouses, no professional justice of…”
Henlopen Hotel Corp. v. Aetna Ins., 236 F. Supp. 416 (D. Del. 1964). “§ 412 ; and citizens cannot be disqualified ‘on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,’ 28 U.S.C. § 415 . In addition, jurors must be returned from such parts of the district as the court may direct ‘so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial, and so…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.