The records and proceedings of the court of appeals, appointed previous to the adoption of the Constitution, shall be kept until deposited with the National Archives of the United States in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court, who shall furnish copies thereof to any person requiring and paying for them, in the manner provided by law for giving copies of the records and proceedings of the Supreme Court. Such copies shall have the same faith and credit as proceedings of the Supreme Court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 2020–2024 · leading case:
Garrow v. Tucson Clips LLC, No. 4:22-cv-00243 (D. Ariz. Jan. 9, 2023).
Young v. Shinn, No. 4:18-cv-00036 (D. Ariz. Mar. 29, 2024).
“See 28 U.S.C. § 6 2254(e)(1). An "unreasonable application of clearly established law" exists if the state court 7 identified the correct governing legal principle from Supreme Court decisions but 8 unreasonably applied that principle to the facts of the case.”
Kelsey Dru Gleghorn v. Jose Gastlo, No. 2:20-cv-05942 (C.D. Cal. July 7, 2020).
“3 In light of the earlier dismissal of the 2012 Petition as untimely and the dismissal of the 2016 4 Petition as successive, the Court concludes that, with respect to Ground One, the instant Petition is 5 likewise successive.”
Lamb v. Smith & Wamsley PLLC, No. 4:24-cv-00024 (D. Ariz. Nov. 21, 2024).
“" 28 U.S.C. § 6 1915(e)(2)(B). In dismissing Lamb's original complaint, the Court directed the Clerk of 7 Court to mail a Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Non-Prisoner Complaint) form 8 instead of a Complaint for a Civil Case form to Lamb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.