28 U.S.C. § 91
Hawaii
Hawaii constitutes one judicial district which includes the Midway Islands, Wake Island, Johnston Island, Sand Island, Kingman Reef, Palmyra Island, Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Canton Island, and Enderbury Island: Provided, That the inclusion of Canton and Enderbury Islands in such judicial district shall in no way be construed to be prejudicial to the claims of the United Kingdom to said Islands in accordance with the agreement of
Court shall be held at Honolulu.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1951–2009 · leading case: Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp., 342 U.S. 237 (1952).
Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp., 342 U.S. 237 (1952). “§ 88 ; for Hawaii, 28 U. S. C. § 91 ; and for Puerto Rico, 28 U.”
United States v. Kil Soo Lee, 472 F.3d 638 (9th Cir. 2006). “” See 28 U.S.C. §§ 91 , 132(a), 451. Moreover, Title 18 applies to American Samoa, an unincorporated territory of the United States.”
Meaamaile v. Am. Samoa, 550 F. Supp. 1227 (D. Haw. 1982). “See 28 U.S.C. § 91 . 5 . It seems that this action might have been dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction on the grounds that defendants and the cause of action lack the constitutionally required minimal contacts with the forum state.”
DeRoburt v. Gannett Co., 83 F.R.D. 574 (D. Haw. 1979). “Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts 1 and 2 and for Summary Judgment on Counts 3 through 6 at 4 (filed March 16, 1979).”
Cavness v. United States, 187 F.2d 719 (9th Cir. 1951). “He brings this appeal, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 91 , 1291, designating as error four rulings of the district court.”
Hendricks v. Alcoa S.S. Co., 206 F. Supp. 693 (E.D. Pa. 1962). “[6] Congress has made specific provision for transfer of certain cases from inferior courts to the District Court of the Virgin Islands ( 48 U.”
United States v. Lee, 159 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 2001). “§ 5 (2000) (defining “United States” as including “all places and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, except the Canal Zone”).”
John G. Duarte Amd T. S. Shinn v. Bank of Hawaii, 287 F.2d 51 (9th Cir. 1961). “In their opening brief in this court appellants argue that they were released from liability as endorsers because the proceeds received from a contract assigned to the bank as security for the note were diverted to other purposes.”
J. D. Charles v. United States, 215 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1954). “See 28 U.S. C.A. §§ 91,133, 62 Stat. 877 , 895.”
Williams v. State of Maryland, 346 F. App'x 974 (4th Cir. 2009). “In denying the temporary restraining order, the district court noted that Williams failed to demonstrate a likelihood of irreparable harm or any of the other requirements necessary to obtain preliminary injunctive relief.”
McAfee v. Gray, 201 F.2d 109 (9th Cir. 1953). “…was either of them appealable. Therefore both appeals are dismissed. 1 . The District of Hawaii has no divisions. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 91 .”
United States v. Paquet, 131 F. Supp. 32 (D. Haw. 1955). “99 (1949), 28 U.S.C.A. § 91 . 5 As indicated by the language of the statute, as well as emphasized by the judicial decisions of appellate courts, the word “entry” is a word of art having the special meaning here accorded to it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.