28 U.S.C. § 952
Repealed. Pub. L. 92–310, title II, § 206(e)(1), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 203]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2021 · leading case: Brainerd v. Kates, 386 N.E.2d 586 (Ill. App. Ct. 1979).
Brainerd v. Kates, 386 N.E.2d 586 (Ill. App. Ct. 1979). “Count II of plaintiff’s complaint describes the clerk’s bond as being required under 28 U.S.C.A. §952 . Defendant’s motion for summary judgment alleges that this statute was repealed prior to the pertinent time period herein involved.”
United States v. Patrick E.G. Peart, 888 F.2d 101 (11th Cir. 1989). “The 28 U.S.C. § 952 (a) charge requires proof that the defendant had knowledge that he was importing a controlled substance.”
Bellozo v. United States (S.D. Cal. 2021). “25 BACKGROUND 26 On August 25, 2017, Defendant was charged with one count of importation of 27 methamphetamine under 28 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. On October 31, 2017, Defendant 28 pleaded guilty to the charge.”
United States v. Gross, 60 F. Supp. 3d 1245 (S.D. Ala. 2014). “1989) (“The 28 U.S.C. § 952 (a) *1248 charge requires proof that the defendant had knowledge that he was importing a controlled substance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.