28 U.S.C. § 96
Kansas
Kansas constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Kansas City, Lawrence, Leavenworth, Salina, Topeka, Hutchinson, Wichita, Dodge City, and Fort Scott.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2025 · leading case: United States v. Walker
United States v. Walker (1995)
“18 would appear to govern the disposition of the defendant's intradistrict change of venue request: Except as otherwise permitted by statute or by these rules, the prosecution shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed.”
Ingeborg Quandt v. Beech Aircraft Corp. (1970)
“28 U.S.C. § 96 provides that Kansas shall constitute one judicial district and that court shall be held in Kansas City, Leavenworth, Salina, Topeka, Hutchinson, Wichita, Dodge City and Fort Scott.”
United States v. Pitter (2012)
“See 28 U.S.C. §§ 96 and 132. The other jurisdictional arguments Pitter has raised are plainly frivolous and merit no further discussion.”
United States v. DeClerck (2005)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 96 . Article I, Section 8 of the U.”
Blanca Peak Resources LLC v. Blue Star Helium Limited (2020)
“Under 28 U.S.C. § 96 , the District of Kansas holds court “at Kansas City, Lawrence, Leavenworth, Salina, Topeka, Hutchinson, Wichita, Dodge City, and Fort Scott,” none of which places for holding court is located in Johnson County, Kansas.”
Wenger v. Severson (2025)
“§ 132 (a) (creating one district court in each judicial district); 28 U.S.C. § 96 (establishing Kansas as one judicial district).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.