U.S. Code » Title 29 » Chapter CHAPTER 18— EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY PROGRAM › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RIGHTS › Subtitle Subtitle B— Regulatory Provisions › Part part 7— group health plan requirements › Subpart Subpart C— General Provisions

29 U.S.C. § 1191c

Regulations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary, consistent with section 104 of the Health Care Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, may promulgate such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this part. The Secretary may promulgate any interim final rules as the Secretary determines are appropriate to carry out this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 2367 (2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 2367 (2020). · cites it 2× “§ 300gg-92 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c ; 26 U.S.C. § 9833 . 2 The ACA exempts "grandfathered" plans from 42 U.”
State of California v. the Little Sisters of the Poor, 911 F.3d 558 (9th Cir. 2018). “§ 9833 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c; 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-92. When enacting the ACA, Congress codified the contraceptive coverage requirement in the same chapters of the United States Code as those provisions.”
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. President United States, 930 F.3d 543 (3rd Cir. 2019). “§ 9833 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c ; 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-92 [hereinafter "Regulation Provision"].”
Danny P. v. Catholic Health Initiatives, 891 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2018). “§ 9833 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c; 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-92. Those are the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of the Treasury.”
Coalition for Parity, Inc. v. Sebelius, 709 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2010). “29 U.S.C. § 1191c, 26 U.S.C. § 9833 (replacing “part” with “chapter”), and 42 U.”
California v. Health & Human Servs., 351 F. Supp. 3d 1267 (N.D. Cal. 2019). “§ 9833 , 29 U.S.C. § 1191c, and 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-92, asserting that those statutes authorized the agencies "to promulgate any interim final rules that they determine are appropriate to carry out" the relevant statutory provisions.”
Metro. Life Ins. v. Bischoff, 366 F. Supp. 2d 455 (W.D. Tex. 2004). “§ 1001 through 29 U.S.C. § 1191c. Having interpreted the term “subchap-ter,” the Court returns to the question of whether this is a suit under Subchapter I of ERISA by a by a participant, beneficiary, or fiduciary and therefore whether it has the discretion to award costs and…”
Mann Constr., Inc. v. United States of Am. (E.D. Mich. 2021). “(quoting 29 U.S.C. § 1191c). The Departments argued that this language authorized them to issue the challenged rules without notice and comment.”
Texas Med. Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (E.D. Tex. 2022). “§ 9833 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c). The APA allows a statute to modify or supersede its procedural requirements “to the extent [the statute] does so expressly.”
Bailey v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs. Inc. (W.D. Tenn. 2025). “§ 300gg-4(n); see also 29 U.S.C. § 1191c (“The Secretary, consistent with section 104 of the Health Care 7 It is a close call on whether Sedgwick waived this sort of argument for failing to raise it earlier.”
Coalition for Parity, Inc. v. Sebelius (D.D.C. 2010). “29 U.S.C. § 1191c, 26 U.S.C. § 9833 (replacing “part” with “chapter”), and 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.