29 U.S.C. § 15
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1952–2023 · leading case: People v. Hartfield, 2022 IL 126729 (Ill. 2022).
People v. Hartfield, 2022 IL 126729 (Ill. 2022). “at 218-19 , the defendant corporation was charged with criminal violations of the minimum wage, overtime, and record- keeping provisions of sections 15 and 16(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ( 29 U.S.C. §§ 15 , 16(a) (1950)). Thirty-two counts were brought against the…”
Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor v. Brown Equip. & Serv. Tools, Inc., 666 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1982). “§ 215 ], including in the case of violations of section 15(a)(2) [, 29 U.S.C. § 15 (a)(2) (making it unlawful to violate the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Act),] the restraint of any withholding of payment of minimum wages or overtime compensation found by the…”
Potter v. Cardinal Health 200, LLC., 381 F. Supp. 3d 729 (E.D. Tex. 2019). “Additionally, Potter's First and Second Amended Complaints expressly allege that Cardinal Health violated 29 U.S.C. § 15 (a)(3). ( See Dkt. No. 5 ¶ 49; Dkt.”
Mallo v. Pub. Health Trust of Dade Cnty., 88 F. Supp. 2d 1376 (S.D. Fla. 2000). “In Golden State Transit, the Court ruled that an applicant petitioning for a taxicab franchise renewal could use § 1983 to enforce his rights under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 15 et seq. (West 1992). See Golden State Transit, 493 U.”
Esmilla v. Cosmopolitan Club, 936 F. Supp. 2d 229 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). “564, § 17 (McKinney). The 2009 amendment became effective on November 24, 2009; the 2010 amendment,, on April 9, 2011.”
Chao v. Hosp. Staffing Servs. Inc., 270 F.3d 374 (6th Cir. 2001). “The creditor urged the Court *387 to recognize an unwritten exception to 29 U.S.C. § 15 (a)(1) that would permit “innocent” secured creditors to traffic in “hot goods.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Automatic Sprinkler Co. Of Pennsylvania, 199 F.2d 64 (3rd Cir. 1952). “” 29 U.S.C.A. § 15 ! et seq. If the Board’s petition for enforcement were sustained and the employer, in consonance with our order, would negotiate a contract with the union we would have a situation where the employees would be bound to work under, terms and conditions fixed…”
Brock v. Ely Grp., Inc., 788 F.2d 1200 (6th Cir. 1986). “The dissent claims that "[t]he practical effect of the majority’s decision is not to remove any tainted goods from competition____” Citi-corp, however, has effectively removed the "taint” from the goods by agreeing to pay the statutorily required wages if this Court holds that…”
Hodgson v. ARA Servs., Inc., 392 F. Supp. 1167 (W.D. Va. 1975). “(ARA), from violating the Act’s minimum wage and record-keeping requirements, 29 U. S.C. § 15(a)(2), (5), with respect to employees of its food services operations at Hargrave Military Academy (hereinafter referred to as Academy) and to restrain the continued withholding of…”
Wilson v. Taronis Fuels Inc. (D. Ariz. 2023). “13 Accordingly, 14 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim for benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 15 1132(a)(1)(B) (§ 503(a)(1) of ERISA) is denied.”
Feds for Med. Freedom v. Biden, Jr. (S.D. Tex. 2022). “There, the Court held that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. § 15 et seq., allows OSHA “to set workplace safety standards,” but “not broad public health measures.”
— 29 U.S.C. § 15(a)(2) — 1 case
Hodgson v. ARA Servs., Inc., 392 F. Supp. 1167 (W.D. Va. 1975). “(ARA), from violating the Act’s minimum wage and record-keeping requirements, 29 U. S.C. § 15(a)(2), (5), with respect to employees of its food services operations at Hargrave Military Academy (hereinafter referred to as Academy) and to restrain the continued withholding of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.