29 U.S.C. § 171
Declaration of purpose and policy
Ex. Ord. No. 11482,
Ex. Ord. No. 11849,
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 65
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case: Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 450 U.S. 728 (1981).
Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 450 U.S. 728 (1981). “It is hornbook law, however, that there is a strong congressional policy favoring grievance procedures and arbitration as a method of resolving labor disputes.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wooster Div. of Borgwarner Corp., 356 U.S. 342 (1958). “152 , 154, 29 U. S. C. §§ 171 (c) and 173 (c). [1] A variety of topics have been held to be subjects over which an employer must bargain.”
Repub. Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650 (1965). “Such activity complements the union's status as exclusive bargaining representative by permitting it to participate actively in the continuing administration of the contract.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Alt. Ent., Inc., 858 F.3d 393 (6th Cir. 2017). “” 29 U.S.C. § 171 (b). It also permits collective bargaining agreements that require arbitration of employees’ individual claims.”
Proctor v. Andrews, 972 S.W.2d 729 (Tex. 1998). “See 29 U.S.C.A. § 171 . It may be that a state legislative delegation of authority to a federal agency is subject to less searching scrutiny than a similar delegation to a private entity.”
Jacob Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp., 823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016). “Indeed, finding the NLRA in conflict with the FAA would be ironic considering that the NLRA is in fact pro-arbitration: it expressly allows unions and employers to arbitrate disputes between each other, see 29 U.S.C. § 171 (b), and to negotiate collective bargaining agreements…”
Int'l Longshore & Warehouse Union v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc., 863 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2017). “” 29 U.S.C. § 171 (a). 6 For all of the above reasons, the nonstatutory exemption shields the alleged Joint Activity of ILWU and PMA from antitrust scrutiny and ICTSI’s counterclaim was properly dismissed.”
Carey v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 375 U.S. 261 (1964). “152 , 29 U. S. C. § 171 (b). Section 203 (d) provides: "Final adjustment by a method agreed upon by the parties is hereby declared to be the desirable method for settlement of grievance disputes arising over the application or interpretation of an existing collective-bargaining…”
Brooks v. Solomon Co., 542 F. Supp. 1229 (N.D. Ala. 1982). “It is the defendants’ position that the matters involved in this action are matters over which there is an overriding federal policy pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 171 et seq., which requires the exclusive application of federal law and further that the statements allegedly made were…”
Winston B. Lewy v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 799 F.2d 1281 (9th Cir. 1986). “§§ 151-169 (1982), and Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 171 et seq. (1982)); Alexander v.”
Tramel R. Bracey v. City of Killeen, Texas & Police Chief Dennis Baldwin, 417 S.W.3d 94 (Tex. App. 2013). “1998) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 171 ). Although the Texas Supreme Court suggested in Proctor that the constitutionality of the Civil Service Act's delegation of power to FMCS to select the list of proposed hearing examiners might be analyzed differently than its delegation of the same…”
Lincoln Mills of Alabama v. Textile Workers Union of Am., CIO, 230 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1956). “Moreover, the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 contains the positive declaration that it is the policy of the United States that “sound and stable industrial peace and the advancement of the general welfare, health and safety of the Nation * * * can most satisfactorily be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.