29 U.S.C. § 1871
State laws and regulations
This chapter is intended to supplement State law, and compliance with this chapter shall not excuse any person from compliance with appropriate State law and regulation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: Chamber of Com. of United States of Am. v. Whiting, 131 S. Ct. 1968 (2011).
Chamber of Com. of United States of Am. v. Whiting, 131 S. Ct. 1968 (2011). “AWPA specifically recognized that federal regulation of farm contracting licensing was only “in tended to supplement State law,” 29 U. S. C. §1871 , and the Chamber argues that the purpose of IRCA’s savings clause was limited to preserving existing state farm con tractor…”
Adams Fruit Co. v. Barrett, 494 U.S. 638 (1990). “In support of this position, Adams Fruit points'to 29 U. S. C. § 1871 (1982 ed.), which provides that the statute “is intended to supplement State law, and compliance with this chapter shall not excuse any person from compliance with appropriate State law and regulation.”
Perez-Farias v. Global Horizons, Inc., 286 P.3d 46 (Wash. 2012). “29 U.S.C. § 1871 . The legislature amended the FLCA to include the civil damages provision in 1985, two years after Congress replaced the FLCRA with the AWPA.”
Ramsford Barrett v. Adams Fruit Co., Inc., 867 F.2d 1305 (11th Cir. 1989). “” 29 U.S.C. § 1871 . To determine whether the Florida statute is preempted under the third basis we must ascertain the purposes and objectives of the Act.”
Domingo Roman v. Sunny Slope Farms, Inc., 817 F.2d 1116 (4th Cir. 1987). “1 We initially note that 29 U.S.C. § 1871 expresses Congress’ intention to supplement state law: “This chapter is intended to supplement state law, and compliance with this chapter shall not excuse any person from compliance with appropriate state law and regulation.”
Churchill Downs Tech. Initiatives Co. v. Michigan Gaming Control Bd. (W.D. Mich. 2025). “29 U.S.C. § 1871 (expressly establishing that “[t]his chapter is intended to supplement State law” (emphasis added)); 33 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.