29 U.S.C. § 188
Repealed. Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 690, § 4(3), 69 Stat. 625
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1957–1996 · leading case: Los Angeles Metro. Transit Auth. v. Bhd. of R.R. Trainmen, 355 P.2d 905 (Cal. 1960).
Los Angeles Metro. Transit Auth. v. Bhd. of R.R. Trainmen, 355 P.2d 905 (Cal. 1960). “120, 29 U.S.C.A. § 188 , which read: "It shall be unlawful for any individual employed by the United States or any agency thereof including wholly owned Government corporations, to participate in any strike.”
Santa Monica Culinary Welfare Fund Charles A. Conine Victor Valenzuela v. Miramar Hotel Corp., 920 F.2d 1491 (9th Cir. 1990). “The Fund is a multiemployer employee benefit plan governed by section 302(c)(5) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 188 (c)(5), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.”
Grandville Mun. Exec. Ass'n v. City of Grandville, 553 N.W.2d 917 (Mich. 1996). “§ 152 ), and precluded government workers from striking ( 29 U.S.C.A. § 188 ___ this provision is now 5 U.”
Sheet Metal Contractors Ass'n of San Francisco, a Corp. v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n, 248 F.2d 307 (9th Cir. 1957). “§ 302(c), (Title 29 U.S.C.A. § 188 (c)), provides in part: “The provisions of this section shall not be applicable * * * (5) with respect to money or other thing of value paid to a trust fund established by such representative, for the sole and exclusive benefit of the employees…”
Joseph C. Wagner, Jr., & Jeffery L. Atchley v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 783 F.2d 1042 (Fed. Cir. 1986). “Those statutes included section 305 of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 188 (1952), which the petitioners tréat as the predecessor of the present statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.