29 U.S.C. § 2811

Repealed. Pub. L. 113–128, title V, § 511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 2002–2015 · leading case: Santana v. Calderon, 342 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2003).
Santana v. Calderon, 342 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2003). “29 U.S.C. § 2811 . To be eligible to receive federal funds under the WIA, a state must submit a State Plan outlining a five-year strategy for the statewide workforce investment system.”
Caraballo-Seda v. Mun. of Hormigueros, 395 F.3d 7 (1st Cir. 2005). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2811 . The consortiums employ administrative staff (“plaintiffs”) on a one-year contract basis to provide services to WIA program beneficiaries.”
Santana v. Calderon, 188 F. Supp. 2d 160 (D.P.R. 2002). · cites it 2× “The purpose of the WIA is to: provide workforce investment activities, through statewide and local workforce investment systems, that increase the employment, retention, and earnings of participants, and increase occupational skill attainment by participants, and, as a result,…”
Borrero-Rodriguez v. Montalvo-Vazquez, 275 F. Supp. 2d 127 (D.P.R. 2003). “This statute provides for workforce investment activities, through state and local units, that increase employment, earnings and occupational skills attainment of participants resulting in an improved quality of the workforce, a reduction of welfare dependency and enhancement of…”
Torres Ramos v. Consorcio De La Montana, 286 F. Supp. 2d 126 (D.P.R. 2003). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2811 . Plaintiff Ramos had worked for the Mountain Consortium since July 1995 as a Training Specialist under an employment contract renewed annually.”
Brown & Co. v. Dutchess Works One-Stop Emp. & Training Ctr., Inc., 73 A.D.3d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). “Moreover, the policies about which the plaintiff complained were authorized under the Act, and were consistent with its stated goals (see 29 USC §§ 2811 , 2864 [d] [4] [F]). The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit.”
MacHie v. Nguyen, 824 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2011). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2811 . The WIA mandates that “[n]o individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in the administration of or in connection with, any such program or activity because of race,…”
Aase v. Wapiti Meadows Cmty. Tech. & Servs., Inc., 832 N.W.2d 852 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). “See 29 U.S.C. § 2811 (2006). In order to receive these funds, a state must establish statewide and local workforce-investment boards to oversee the distribution of the funds.”
Am. Fed'n of State v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Bd., 111 A.3d 1140 (Pa. 2015). “See 29 U.S.C. § 2811 ; 81 C.J.S. Soc. Sec. & Pub.”
Diversified Educ. Training & Mfg. Co. v. City of Wichita, 473 F. Supp. 2d 1140 (D. Kan. 2007). “29 U.S.C. §2811 . 6 . In its briefing in this case, DETAMC has objected to the admission of a document outlining the policies and procedures of the SDA IV; the court finds DETAMC’s objection moot for the purpose of ruling on this motion because that document is not in the…”
Gonzalez-Caratini v. Garcia-Padilla, 278 F. Supp. 2d 189 (D.P.R. 2003). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2811 . Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 2841 “one stop delivery systems” may be established as part of the program whereby the services provided in accordance with the statute are made available to participants in a single location.”
Rwm Consultants, Inc. v. Centro De Gestion Unica Del Suroeste, 491 F. Supp. 2d 245 (D.P.R. 2007). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2811 . Employment and training opportunities offered in accordance with the WIA may be furnished either through public or private entities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.