U.S. Code » Title 29 » CHAPTER 10— DISCLOSURE OF WELFARE AND PENSION PLANS

29 U.S.C. § 301 to 309

Repealed. Pub. L. 93–406, title I, § 111(a)(1), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 851

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

29 U.S.C. § 303 has no page of its own: the Office of the Law Revision Counsel prints it together with other sections as the single entry 29 U.S.C. § 301 to 309, shown below.

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1970–1987 · leading case: Stand. Oil Co. of California v. Agsalud, 442 F. Supp. 695 (N.D. Cal. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stand. Oil Co. of California v. Agsalud, 442 F. Supp. 695 (N.D. Cal. 1977). “§ 1031 (a)(1)), also provides some guidance to legislative intent in ERISA; The language of § 4(b)(3) of ERISA evolved from language first used by Congress in § 4(b)(2) of WPPDA, 29 U.S.C.A § 303(b)(2). Section 4(b)(2) provides that WPPDA “shall not apply to an employee welfare…”
United States v. Milton Silverman, 430 F.2d 106 (2d Cir. 1970). “” The Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act provides, at 29 U.S.C. § 303 (a) (1964), that it applies to “any employee welfare or pension benefit plan if it is established or maintained by any employer or employers engaged in commerce or any industry or activity affecting…”
Donna L. Nichols v. Bd. of Trs. of the Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension Plan, 835 F.2d 881 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 29 U.S.C. § 303 (b) (stating that the factors to be considered include “but shall not be limited to” the four-factor analysis); see also H.”
Lamb v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins., 509 F. Supp. 560 (D.N.J. 1980). · cites it 2× “of [the Internal Revenue] Code [of 1954]”. 29 U.S.”
United States v. Fred Ferrara, 451 F.2d 91 (2d Cir. 1971). “under 29 U.S.C. § 303 (b) (4), and here there may be a question whether the officers’ Retirement Fund was absorbed into and may be treated as one with a larger, if later, employees’ plan of Local 11.”
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287 (2d Cir. 1981). “Section 4(b)(3) closely parallels § 4(b)(2) of the Welfare and Pensions Plan Disclosure Act of 1958, 29 U.S.C. § 303 (b)(2) (repealed by ERISA), which exempted from regulation under that act “plan[s] .”
Richardson v. Commc'ns Workers, 530 F.2d 126 (8th Cir. 1976). “The trial court therefore properly denied plaintiff’s motion to direct liability against the defendants.”
29 U.S.C. § 303(b)(2): 1 case
Stand. Oil Co. of California v. Agsalud, 442 F. Supp. 695 (N.D. Cal. 1977). “§ 1031 (a)(1)), also provides some guidance to legislative intent in ERISA; The language of § 4(b)(3) of ERISA evolved from language first used by Congress in § 4(b)(2) of WPPDA, 29 U.S.C.A § 303(b)(2). Section 4(b)(2) provides that WPPDA “shall not apply to an employee welfare…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.