29 U.S.C. § 522

Extortionate picketing; penalty for violation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) It shall be unlawful to carry on picketing on or about the premises of any employer for the purpose of, or as part of any conspiracy or in furtherance of any plan or purpose for, the personal profit or enrichment of any individual (except a bona fide increase in wages or other employee benefits) by taking or obtaining any money or other thing of value from such employer against his will or with his consent.(b) Any person who willfully violates this section shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.(Pub. L. 86–257, title VI, § 602, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 539.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1975–1982 · leading case: United States v. Enrico Campanale & Donald Matthews, United States of Am. v. Mike Grancich, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Enrico Campanale & Donald Matthews, United States of Am. v. Mike Grancich, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975). “§ 1951 (Counts 5, 6 and 7), and picketing for personal profit in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 522 (Counts 8 and 9). 3 Another indictment returned on February 13, 1973, just prior to trial 4 charged Galea and Martinez with one count of obstruction of justice through injury to…”

United States v. Local 560, 550 F. Supp. 511 (D.N.J. 1982). · cites it 2× “When compared to the prohibition within the LMRDA against extortionate picketing, 29 U.S.C. § 522 , 18 it becomes even clearer that Congress carefully chose the words it did and the penalty to be imposed in section 530 in order to penalize labor extortion in the one instance but…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.