As used in this chapter “United States” includes Alaska. “Acquired lands” or “lands acquired by the United States” include all lands heretofore or hereafter acquired by the United States to which the “mineral leasing laws” have not been extended, including such lands acquired under the provisions of the Act of March 1, 1911 (36 Stat. 961, 16 U.S.C., sec. 552). “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Interior, “Mineral leasing laws” shall mean the Act of October 20, 1914 (38 Stat. 741, 48 U.S.C., sec. 432); the Act of February 25, 1920 (41 Stat. 437, 30 U.S.C., sec. 181); the Act of April 17, 1926 (44 Stat. 301, 30 U.S.C., sec. 271); the Act of February 7, 1927 (44 Stat. 1057, 30 U.S.C., sec. 281), and all Acts heretofore or hereafter enacted which are amendatory of or supplementary to any of the foregoing Acts. “Lease” includes “prospecting permit” unless the context otherwise requires. The term “oil” shall embrace all nongaseous hydrocarbon substances other than those leasable as coal, oil shale, or gilsonite (including all vein-type solid hydrocarbons).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
29
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1954–2023 · leading case:
Watt v. Alaska, 451 U.S. 259 (1981).
Watt v. Alaska, 451 U.S. 259 (1981).
· cites it 4× “913 , 30 U. S. C. § 351 et seq. See n. 10, supra.”
Stephen Thompson v. William P. Clark, Sec'y of the Interior, 741 F.2d 401 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
“913 (1947), as amended, 30 U.S.C. § 351 et seq. (1982): The law establishes two basic regimes for allocating onshore oil and gas lands: “competitive leases” with five-year terms, for land located within a known geological structure of a producing oil and gas field, 30 U.”
Mafrige v. United States, 893 F. Supp. 691 (S.D. Tex. 1995).
“, and the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands of 1947, 30 U.S.C. §§ 351 et seq., the BLM leased the oil, gas, and other minerals under 273.”
Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. Andrus, 498 F. Supp. 668 (D.D.C. 1980).
“913 (currently codified as amended at 30 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.). Of the provisions of that enactment providing for the leasing of acquired lands, most pertinent to this case is its language, found in section 352 of title 30 of the United States Code, denoting which acquired lands…”
Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Hodel, 630 F. Supp. 621 (D.D.C. 1986).
· cites it 2× “nd the intervenors contend that the applications were denied because the reclamation technologies relied upon and proferred by the plaintiffs were inadequate to ensure restoration of the mined portions of the Osceola Forest to the purposes for which they were acquired and the…”
Juliana v. United States, 339 F. Supp. 3d 1062 (D. Or. 2018).
“Instead, plaintiffs urge that their request for relief, at its core, is one for a declaration that their constitutional rights have been violated and an order for federal defendants to develop their own plan, using existing resources, capacities, and legal authority, to bring…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.