Notes of Decisions
Sec'y of Labor v. Nat'l Cement Co. of California, 494 F.3d 1066 (D.C. Cir. 2007).
· cites it 16× “" 30 U.S.C. § 802 (h)(1). The ALJ concluded that the Access Road is a "mine" under section 3(h)(1)(B) so as to come within the jurisdiction of MSHA because, under the unambiguous language of section 3(h)(1)(A) and the undisputed facts, it is both "private" and "appurtenant…”
RNS Servs., Inc. v. Sec'y of Labor, 115 F.3d 182 (3d Cir. 1997).
· cites it 20× “” 30 U.S.C. § 802 (i) (1988). RNS contends that the MSHA (and the Commission) lack jurisdiction because the Site is not one at which “the work of preparing the coal” occurs and the material handled at the Site is not pure coal.”
Sec'y of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co., 456 F.3d 151 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
· cites it 4× “” 30 U.S.C. § 802 (d) (emphasis added). (The entities listed before the italicized “or” are also known as “production-operators.”
Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981).
· cites it 2× “" 30 U. S. C. § 802 (h) (1) (1976 ed., Supp.”
Amigo Smokeless Coal Co. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, U. S. Dept. Of Labor, & Clarence Bower, 642 F.2d 68 (4th Cir. 1981).
· cites it 4× “30 U.S.C. § 802 provides: (h) “coal mine” means an area of land and all structures, facilities, machinery, tools, equipment, shafts, slopes, tunnels, excavations, and other property, real or personal, placed upon, under, or above the surface of such land by any person, used in,…”
Raymond J. Donovan v. Carolina Stalite Co., 734 F.2d 1547 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
· cites it 5× “The principal issue on appeal is whether Carolina Stalite’s facility constitutes a “mine” within the meaning of section 3(h) of- the Act, 30 U.S.C. § 802 (h) (1982). We conclude that it does.”
Bush & Burchett, Inc. v. Robert B. Reich, 117 F.3d 932 (6th Cir. 1997).
· cites it 6× “Most courts that have construed the statutory definitions of 30 U.S.C. § 802 to determine whether MSHA has jurisdiction over an entity or work site have not indicated what standard of review they used.”
Pennsylvania Elec. Co. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 969 F.2d 1501 (3d Cir. 1992).
· cites it 6× “We affirm first, because the Penelec conveyor head drives constitute the “work of preparing coal” and thus they fall under the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 802 (h)(1), and second, because the Mine Safety and Health Administration promulgated regulations that preempt the Occupational…”
Power Fuels, LLC v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 777 F.3d 214 (4th Cir. 2015).
· cites it 8× “” 30 U.S.C. § 802 (h)(1)(C), (i). Power Fuels challenged the Secretary of Labor’s assignment of jurisdiction to MSHA, rather than to the nonspecialized Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”).”
30 U.S.C. § 802(b): 1 case
30 U.S.C. § 802(h): 1 case
30 U.S.C. § 802(h)(1)(C): 1 case
30 U.S.C. § 802(j): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.