Notes of Decisions
Sec'y of Labor, Mine Saf. & Health Admin. v. Nat'l Cement Co. of California, Inc., 494 F.3d 1066 (D.C. Cir. 2007).
· cites it 16× “" 30 U.S.C. § 802 (h)(1). The ALJ concluded that the Access Road is a "mine" under section 3(h)(1)(B) so as to come within the jurisdiction of MSHA because, under the unambiguous language of section 3(h)(1)(A) and the undisputed facts, it is both "private" and "appurtenant…”
Sec'y of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co., 456 F.3d 151 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
· cites it 4× “” 30 U.S.C. § 802 (d) (emphasis added). (The entities listed before the italicized “or” are also known as “production-operators.”
Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981).
· cites it 2× “" 30 U. S. C. § 802 (h) (1) (1976 ed., Supp.”
Amigo Smokeless Coal Co. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, U. S. Dept. Of Labor, & Clarence Bower, 642 F.2d 68 (4th Cir. 1981).
· cites it 4× “30 U.S.C. § 802 provides: (h) “coal mine” means an area of land and all structures, facilities, machinery, tools, equipment, shafts, slopes, tunnels, excavations, and other property, real or personal, placed upon, under, or above the surface of such land by any person, used in,…”
Pennsylvania Elec. Co. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 969 F.2d 1501 (3rd Cir. 1992).
· cites it 6× “We affirm first, because the Penelec conveyor head drives constitute the “work of preparing coal” and thus they fall under the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 802 (h)(1), and second, because the Mine Safety and Health Administration promulgated regulations that preempt the Occupational…”
Power Fuels, LLC v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 777 F.3d 214 (4th Cir. 2015).
· cites it 8× “” 30 U.S.C. § 802 (h)(1)(C), (i). Power Fuels challenged the Secretary of Labor’s assignment of jurisdiction to MSHA, rather than to the nonspecialized Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”).”
— 30 U.S.C. § 802(b) — 1 case
— 30 U.S.C. § 802(h) — 1 case
— 30 U.S.C. § 802(h)(1)(C) — 1 case
— 30 U.S.C. § 802(j) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.