30 U.S.C. § 924a

Repealed. Pub. L. 107–275, § 2(c)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1926

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 30 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1994 · leading case: North Am. Coal Corp. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, & Rochino Ariotti, 854 F.2d 386 (10th Cir. 1988).
North Am. Coal Corp. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, & Rochino Ariotti, 854 F.2d 386 (10th Cir. 1988). “The Act directed that all recipients of disability benefits under part B be notified of this opportunity and be given no less than six months after notification to file their claims for medical benefits under part C, 30 U.S.C. § 924a. On April 25, 1978, the Secretary of Labor…”
Elliot Coal Mining Co. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 17 F.3d 616 (3rd Cir. 1994). “See 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 924a, 921-925. Such Part B claims were filed with and adjudicated by the Social Security Administration, and benefits were paid to eligible claimants out of general federal revenues.”
James Milam v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 874 F.2d 223 (4th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “The language and construction of 30 U.S.C. § 924a are the obvious starting points of Milam’s claim.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.