30 U.S.C. § 925
Procedure for the determination of claims during transition period
2002—Subsec. (a)(2) to (5). Pub. L. 107–275, § 2(b)(3)(A), redesignated pars. (3) to (5) as (2) to (4), respectively, substituted “paragraph (2)” for “paragraph 4” in par. (4), and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “The manner and place of filing such claim shall be in accordance with regulations issued jointly by the Commissioner of Social Security and the Secretary of Labor, which regulations shall provide, among other things, that such claims may be filed in district offices of the Social Security Administration and thereafter transferred to the jurisdiction of the Department of Labor for further consideration.”
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–275, § 2(b)(3)(B), struck out “, after consultation with the Commissioner of Social Security,” after “Secretary of Labor”.
1994—Subsecs. (a)(2), (b). Pub. L. 103–296 substituted “Commissioner of Social Security” for “Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare”.
1986—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” for “Internal Revenue Code of 1954”, which for purposes of codification was translated as “title 26” thus requiring no change in text.
1981—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 97–119 substituted “section 9501(d) of title 26” for “section 934 of this title”.
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–275 effective 90 days after
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–296 effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48
cases, 1974–1998 · leading case: Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1 (1976).
Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1 (1976). “[8] Claims filed during the transition period between the Federal Government benefit provision under Part B, and state plan or operator benefit provision under Part C that is, July 1 to December 31, 1973are adjudicated *10 under § 415 of Part B, 30 U. S. C. § 925 (1970 ed.,…”
Dir., Off. of Workmen's Comp. Prog., United States Dep't of Labor v. Alabama By-Prods. Corp., 560 F.2d 710 (5th Cir. 1977). “Section 415 of Part B, 30 U.S.C. § 925 , establishes this six month duration as a transition period during which primary liability for black lung claims shifts from the federal treasury to the employer of the disabled or deceased miner, and primary responsibility for processing…”
Hattie Hall v. Sec'y, Health, Educ. & Welfare, 600 F.2d 556 (6th Cir. 1979). “Section 415 is codified at 30 U.S.C. § 925 (1976) and prescribes procedures to be followed in processing claims filed during the “transition period” for transfer of administrative responsibility for black lung benefits claims from the Secretary of HEW to the Secretary of Labor.”
James W. Begley v. F. David Mathews, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 544 F.2d 1345 (6th Cir. 1976). “30 U.S.C. § 925 . Successful claims filed during this interim period would be *1351 paid by the United States until December 81, 1973 ( 30 U.”
Odie Ingram v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 547 F.2d 904 (5th Cir. 1977). “30 U.S.C. § 925 . The United States government would pay these claims until December 31, 1973 ( 30 U.”
Ralph Parker v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 590 F.2d 748 (8th Cir. 1979). “§ 921 (c), incorporated by 30 U.S.C. § 925 and 30 U.S.C. § 932 . The Director has withdrawn opposition to the Court’s jurisdiction on the grounds of lack of a final reviewable order.”
Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs v. Peabody Coal Co., 554 F.2d 310 (7th Cir. 1977). “V, 1975), as made applicable to the claim through § 415(a)(1), 30 U.S.C. § 925 (a)(1) (Supp. V, 1975). The Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor (Director), appealed this decision to the Benefits Review Board.”
Peabody Coal Co. & Old Repub. Ins. Co. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 778 F.2d 358 (7th Cir. 1985). “…U.S.C. § 921 (c), as incorporated by §§ 415(a)(5) and 422(a) of the Black Lung Benefits Act, codified as amended at 30 U.S.C. §§ 925 (a)(5) and 932(a). II A. Statutory Authority Peabody argues that the Secretary exceeded his statutory authority in promulgating the §…”
Peabody Coal Co. & Old Repub. Ins. Co. v. Lessie L. Helms & Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 859 F.2d 486 (7th Cir. 1988). “§ 921 (c), as incorporated by § 422(a) of the Black Lung Benefits Act (BLBA), 30 U.S. C. § 925(a)(5), 932(a). Accord, Peabody Coal Co.”
Roland Newman v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 745 F.2d 1162 (8th Cir. 1984). “30 U.S.C. § 925 (1982). 2 . The black lung disability benefit program, originally enacted as title IV of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, Pub.”
Talley v. Mathews, 550 F.2d 911 (4th Cir. 1977). “30 U.S.C. § 925 (a)(1). 6 The Senate Report indicates Congress was dissatisfied with the results obtained under the statute as originally enacted.”
Albert W. Freeman v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant, 625 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1980). “30 U.S.C. § 925 (a)(5) (1976). Claims filed after December 31, 1973, are paid through state workers’ compensation plans if the State has developed a plan which meets the approval of the Secretary of Labor.”
— 30 U.S.C. § 925(a) — 1 case
Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor v. Joaquin Gurule, 653 F.2d 1368 (10th Cir. 1981).
— 30 U.S.C. § 925(a)(5) — 1 case
Peabody Coal Co. & Old Repub. Ins. Co. v. Lessie L. Helms & Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 859 F.2d 486 (7th Cir. 1988). “§ 921 (c), as incorporated by § 422(a) of the Black Lung Benefits Act (BLBA), 30 U.S. C. § 925(a)(5), 932(a). Accord, Peabody Coal Co.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.