31 U.S.C. § 1102
Fiscal year
The fiscal year of the Treasury begins on October 1 of each year and ends on September 30 of the following year. Accounts of receipts and expenditures required under law to be published each year shall be published for the fiscal year.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64
cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars, 461 U.S. 555 (1983).
United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars, 461 U.S. 555 (1983). “31 U. S. C. § 1102 (a). Since the Bank Secrecy Act does not specify the procedures to be followed in seizing monetary instruments, the Customs Service generally follows the procedures governing forfeitures for violations of the customs laws, as set forth in 19 U.”
Hamed Almaqrami v. Michael Pompeo, 933 F.3d 774 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “33 (a)(1), (d) ; see 31 U.S.C. § 1102 . B In March 2017, President Trump invoked his authority under 8 U.”
United States v. Six Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($6,700.00) in United States Currency, Appeal of John H. Naffke, Jr., Etc, 615 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1980). “§ 1101 (a) be forfeited to the government in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1102 (a). On February 27, 1977, Raymond Carl Naffke entered the United States with $6,700.”
Ivers v. United States, 581 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1978). “86 was seized pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 1102 . 3 Ivers was also charged with entering the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.”
United States v. Eleven Thousand Five Hundred & Eighty Dollars ($11,580) in United States Currency, 454 F. Supp. 376 (M.D. Fla. 1978). “is inapplicable here because monetary instruments were seized under authority of 31 U.S. C.A. § 1102. In addition, these claimants have no standing upon which to object to forfeiture of the MG which was seized, pursuant to § 1602 et seq.”
United States v. Currency Totalling $48,318.08, Philip A. Demassa, Intervenor-Appellant, 609 F.2d 210 (5th Cir. 1980). “” 31 U.S.C. § 1102 (a). The doctrine of relation back as announced in Stowell does not apply where the statute provides only for a possibility of subsequent forfeiture.”
United States v. Delia Aguilar San Juan, 545 F.2d 314 (2d Cir. 1976). “31 U.S.C. § 1102 ; 31 C.F.R. § 103.48 . 31 U.”
United States v. Four Million, Two Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand, Etc., United States of Am. v. Three Million, Six Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand, Etc., 762 F.2d 895 (11th Cir. 1985). “§ 5317 , formerly codified as 31 U.S.C. § 1102 , provides, in pertinent part: (b) A monetary instrument being transported may be seized and forfeited to the United States Government when a report on the instrument under section 5316 of this title has not been filed or contains a…”
United States v. One 1964 Mg, Serial No. 64ghn3l34408, Etc., 408 F. Supp. 1025 (W.D. Wash. 1976). “§ 1595a and 31 U.S.C.A. § 1102 . The claimants of the currency, Michael L.”
United States v. Thirty-Six Thousand, One Hundred & Twenty-Five Dollars, 510 F. Supp. 303 (E.D. La. 1980). “1 The currency was seized pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 1102 . 2 On December 15, 1977, Albrecht was indicted by the grand jury for violation of 18 U.”
California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz, 416 U.S. 21 (1974). “Monetary instruments which are transported without the filing of a required report, or with a materially erroneous report, are subject to forfeiture under § 232 of the Act, 31 U. S. C. § 1102 ; a person who has failed to file the required report or who has filed a false report…”
United States v. Willi Beusch & Deak & Co. of California, Inc., United States of Am. v. Willi Beusch & Deak & Co. of California, Inc., 596 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1979). “In addition, 31 U.S.C. § 1102 provides that any monetary instruments in the process of transportation, with respect to which a report required by § 231 of the Act has not been filed or contains material omissions, is subject to seizure and forfeiture to the United States.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.