U.S. Code » Title 31 » Subtitle SUBTITLE II— THE BUDGET PROCESS › Chapter CHAPTER 13— APPROPRIATIONS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND PENALTIES

31 U.S.C. § 1354

Limitation on use of appropriated funds for contracts with entities not meeting veterans’ employment reporting requirements

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 31 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), no agency may obligate or expend funds appropriated for the agency for a fiscal year to enter into a contract described in section 4212(a) of title 38 with a contractor from which a report was required under section 4212(d) of that title with respect to the preceding fiscal year if such contractor did not submit such report.(2) Paragraph (1) shall cease to apply with respect to a contractor otherwise covered by that paragraph on the date on which the contractor submits the report required by such section 4212(d) for the fiscal year concerned.(b) The Secretary of Labor shall make available in a database a list of the contractors that have complied with the provisions of such section 4212(d).(Added Pub. L. 105–339, § 7(b)(1), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3189.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2009–2015 · leading case: United States Ex Rel. Kirk v. Schindler Elevator Corp., 601 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States Ex Rel. Kirk v. Schindler Elevator Corp., 601 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2010). · cites it 7× “In 1998, Congress passed the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1354 , which provides that “no agency may obligate or expend funds .”
United States Ex Rel. Kirk v. Schindler Elevator Corp., 606 F. Supp. 2d 448 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). · cites it 4× “” 31 U.S.C. § 1354 (a). To facilitate compliance, an implementing rule provides that “by submission of its offer, the offeror represents that, if it is subject to the reporting requirements [of VEVRAA] .”
United States ex rel. Kirk v. Schindler Elevator Corp., 130 F. Supp. 3d 866 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). · cites it 3× “31 U.S.C. § 1354 (1998); see also 48 C.F.”
United States ex rel. Kirk v. Schindler Elevator Corp., 926 F. Supp. 2d 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). “See 31 U.S.C. § 1354 (a). The focus of Kirk’s claims is his allegation that Schindler knowingly filed false VETS100 reports in order to obtain federal money.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.