U.S. Code » Title 33 » Chapter CHAPTER 33— PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPS

33 U.S.C. § 1413

INFORMATION GATHERING AUTHORITY.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 33 CasesGoogle Scholar

“The authority of sections 308(a) and (b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1318(a), (b)], as amended, shall be available to the Administrator to carry out the provisions of this title. The Administrator and the Secretary shall minimize, to the extent practicable, duplication of or inconsistency with the inspection, sampling, testing, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements established by the Secretary under section 1406 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2021 · leading case: Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Douglas M. Costle, in His Off. Capacity as Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency (Ocean Dumping), 629 F.2d 118 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Douglas M. Costle, in His Off. Capacity as Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency (Ocean Dumping), 629 F.2d 118 (D.C. Cir. 1980). · cites it 5× “MPRSA § 103(a), 33 U.S.C. § 1413 (a) (1976). “Dredged material” is defined as “any material excavated or dredged from the navigable waters of the United States.”
Save Our Sound Fisheries Ass'n v. Callaway, 387 F. Supp. 292 (D.R.I. 1974). · cites it 13× “See Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1413 ; Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, 33 U.”
Manatee Cnty. v. Gorsuch, 554 F. Supp. 778 (M.D. Fla. 1982). · cites it 4× “Thus, the Corps is authorized to issue permits for the disposal of dredged materials, 33 U.S.C. § 1413 , and the EPA has permit authority for all other wastes.”
Sierra Club v. James M. Sigler, Etc., Pelican Terminal Co. & Galveston Wharves, Intervenors-Appellees, 695 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1983). “§ 1344 , section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1413 , and section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of 1899, 33 U.”
Half Moon Bay Fishermans' Mktg. Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1988). · cites it 3× “§§ 4321 , et seq (1982), Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuary Act (“MPRSA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1413 (a) (1986), and all regulations promulgated under these statutes, with regard to the initial dumping of 500,000 cubic yards of dredged materials at site BIB.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc., & the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, as Sec'y of the Army, 524 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1975). “The change was Congress’ enactment of 33 U.S.C. § 1413 (d), which provides that the Secretary of the Army may authorize the dumping of nonconforming dredge spoil in the ocean if he concludes that no other economically feasible method or site is available.”
Save Our Sound Fisheries Ass'n v. Callaway, 429 F. Supp. 1136 (D.R.I. 1977). “33 U.S.C. § 1413 . See SOSF I, supra, at 300-303.”
Town of Huntington v. Marsh, 859 F.2d 1134 (2d Cir. 1988). · cites it 2× “33 U.S.C. § 1413 . Congress amended the Ocean Dumping Act in 1980 to require that dumping of dredged material in Long Island Sound by federal agencies, or by private parties whose projects exceed 25,000 cys of waste, be subject to the environmental testing criteria of the Act.”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Benn, 491 F. Supp. 1234 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “Finally, defendants state that because the EPA has “the final word” on issuing dumping permits, see 33 U.S.C. § 1413 (c), that agency is equally responsible for NYD’s policies.”
City of New York v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 543 F. Supp. 1084 (S.D.N.Y. 1981). “33 U.S.C. § 1413 (a). The validity of the regulations that govern dredged materials is not before this Court.”
Town of Huntington v. Marsh, 884 F.2d 648 (2d Cir. 1989). “In addition to the process mandated by NEPA, see 42 U.S.C. § 4322 (2)(c) (1982), this case is governed, as Huntington I held, by the substantive standards set by the Ocean Dumping Act, see 33 U.”
Clean Ocean Action v. York, 861 F. Supp. 1203 (D.N.J. 1994). · cites it 3× “I directed the Port Authority (i) to establish that the permit was lawfully issued under the regulations adopted pursuant to the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1413 (“MPRSA”) either because the dioxin present in the sediment was only in…”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.