Notes of Decisions
Bath Iron Works Corp. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 506 U.S. 153 (1993).
· cites it 8× “For claims *158 in which “the average weekly wages are determined under section 910(d)(2),” that is, for retirees with claims involving “an occupational disease which does not immediately result in death or disability,” 33 U. S. C. § 910 (i), a new § 8(c)(23) provides that…”
SGS Control Servs. v. Dir., 86 F.3d 438 (5th Cir. 1996).
· cites it 7× “The determination of average weekly wage is governed by 33 U.S.C. § 910 , which provides in pertinent part: § 910.”
Rhine v. Stevedoring Servs. of Am., 596 F.3d 1161 (9th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 4× “First, he contends that the ALJ committed both legal and factual errors in calculating his average weekly wage under 33 U.S.C. § 910 (c). Second, he argues that the BRB committed legal error by reducing his compensation by the amount he could have earned in non-longshore work…”
New Thoughts Finishing Co. v. Chilton, 118 F.3d 1028 (5th Cir. 1997).
· cites it 4× “33 U.S.C. § 910 (d)(1). The parties and the ALJ agree that the computation of Chilton’s average annual earnings is governed by Section 10(c) of the Act, 33 U.”
33 U.S.C. § 910(a): 1 case
33 U.S.C. § 910(b): 1 case
33 U.S.C. § 910(c): 3 cases
33 U.S.C. § 910(d)(1): 1 case
33 U.S.C. § 910(e): 1 case
33 U.S.C. § 910(h): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.