35 U.S.C. § 12
Copies of patents and applications for public libraries
The Director may supply copies of specifications and drawings of patents and published applications for patents in printed or electronic form to public libraries in the United States which shall maintain such copies for the use of the public, at the rate for each year’s issue established for this purpose in section 41(d).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1942–2019 · leading case: Sram Corp. v. Ad-ii Eng'g, Inc., 326 F. Supp. 2d 903 (N.D. Ill. 2004).
Sram Corp. v. Ad-ii Eng'g, Inc., 326 F. Supp. 2d 903 (N.D. Ill. 2004). “After SRAM’s summary judgment motion was fully briefed, AD-II moved to amend its pleading, seeking to add a defense of invalidity of the ’291 patent for failure to meet the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 12 ¶ 1. The court stayed ruling on the summary judgment…”
Speed Track, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2019). “) 21 Defendants contend that the “wherein” clause should be interpreted as step-plus-function 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 12 ¶ 6.9 Defendants argue that claim 1 is invalid because the specification fails 23 to disclose an algorithm that is “guaranteed” to produce at least one entry in…”
New Wrinkle, Inc. v. Fritz, 45 F. Supp. 108 (W.D.N.Y. 1942). “§ 488, 35 U.S. C.A. § 12. The claims are to be read in connection with the specification.”
In re Constant, 31 F. App'x 715 (Fed. Cir. 2002). “§ 103 (a), and as lacking an adequate written description and relying on a nonenabling disclosure under 35 U.S.C. § 12 , paragraph 1. Ex parte Constant, Paper No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.