37 U.S.C. § 804

Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XI, § 1122(c)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 463]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 37 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1969–2001 · leading case: Combs v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 592 (Fed. Cl. 2001).
Combs v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 592 (Fed. Cl. 2001). · cites it 2× “The statute that is relevant to this discussion is 37 U.S.C. § 804 , which states in full: § 804.”
United States v. Brown, 4 M.J. 654 (1977). “37 U.S.C. § 804 . . Department of Defense, Military Pay and Allowances Manual, paragraph 10316b (1 Jan.”
United States v. Bolden, 18 C.M.A. 119 (1969). · cites it 4× “Whether the law officer erred to the prejudice of the accused by failing to advise the court-martial of the provisions of 37 USC § 804 . 2. Whether the staff judge advocate’s failure to advise the convening authority of the provisions of 37 USC § 804 prejudiced the accused.”
United States v. Grady, 18 C.M.A. 122 (1969). · cites it 3× “Whether the staff judge advocate’s failure to advise the convening authority of the provisions of 37 USC § 804 prejudiced the appellant. 2.”
United States v. Jones, 18 C.M.A. 124 (1969). · cites it 2× “Because section 804 of Title 37, United States Code, provides that pay and allowances do not accrue to an enlisted member of the Army or Air Force who is confined under sentence of a dishonorable discharge “while the execution of the sentence to discharge is suspended,” we are…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.