38 U.S.C. § 106
REPORT ON ACCESS TO AND QUALITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENINGS FURNISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1987–2020 · leading case: Fogel v. Dep't of Def., 169 F. Supp. 2d 140 (E.D.N.Y 2001).
Fogel v. Dep't of Def., 169 F. Supp. 2d 140 (E.D.N.Y 2001). “38 U.S.C. § 106 (a). The Act also provided the Secretary of Defense with the authority to grant veteran status to “any person in any other similarly situated group the members of which rendered service to the Armed Forces of the United States.”
Schumacher v. Aldridge, 665 F. Supp. 41 (D.D.C. 1987). “1449 (1977) (codified at 38 U.S.C. § 106 note) authorizes the Secretary to recognize the “active military service” of certain groups of individuals who engaged in activities related to World War II.”
William E. Frasure , Jr. v. Anthony J. Principi, 18 Vet. App. 379 (Vet. App. 2004). “1433 , 1449-50 (found at 38 U.S.C. § 106 (note)) [hereinafter Public Law 95-202 § 401 or § 401], as a “veteran” who was eligible for VA compensation benefits because the period of his oceangoing service did not occur between December 7, 1941, and August 15, 1945.”
Meeks v. West, 13 Vet. App. 40 (Vet. App. 1999). “There are also numerous references to the determining or the granting or presuming of service connection, without reference to compensation, made in several statutory provisions in chapter 11 and a few outside it.”
Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 848 F.2d 125 (9th Cir. 1988). “Another example is 38 U.S.C. § 106 (a)(1) and (2), which requires individuals falling under that subsection to “elect which benefit [they] will receive”, if they are entitled to compensation from both the VA and FECA for the same service.”
00-16 910 (Board of Vet. App. 2017). “See 38 U.S.C.A. § 106 (d)(1); 38 C.F.R. § 3.6 (e).”
191118-44570 (Board of Vet. App. 2020). “38 U.S.C. § 106 (d); 38 C.F.R. § 3.6 (e).”
181113-854 (Board of Vet. App. 2020). “38 U.S.C. § 106 (d); 38 C.F.R. § 3.6 (e).”
Frasure, Jr. v. Nicholson, 156 F. App'x 325 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “Additionally, Frasure contends that the Veterans Court decision is premised on a misinterpretation of 38 U.S.C. § 106 , note. Section 106 is the source of Congressional authority for recognition of certain civilian groups as having “veteran” status for purposes of Title 38.”
Smith v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 593 F. App'x 985 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “1449 (1977) (codified at 38 U.S.C. § 106 note); 32 C.F.R. § 47.1 (b); OPM Handbook § 20A2.”
Hogwood v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 409 (Vet. App. 1992). “1449 (1977) (codified at 38 U.S.C. § 106 (note)) (authorizing the Secretary of Defense to recognize as active military service the service of certain groups of individuals whose activities assisted the armed forces during World War II); see 38 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.