38 U.S.C. § 2014
Training and technical assistance for recipients of certain financial assistance
A prior section 2014 was renumbered section 2016 of this title.
Another prior section 2014 was renumbered section 4214 of this title.
Another prior section 2014 was renumbered section 4105 of this title.
Pub. L. 117–328, div. U, title III, § 305(b)(2),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1981–1989 · leading case: Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, & Agric. Implement Workers v. Brock, 477 U.S. 274 (1986).
Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, & Agric. Implement Workers v. Brock, 477 U.S. 274 (1986). “§ 2013 , and the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U. S. C. §§ 2014 , 2024, petitioners sought a declaration that the interpretation was improper and an injunction requiring the Secretary both to notify all cooperating state agencies of the invalidity…”
Bey v. Bolger, 540 F. Supp. 910 (E.D. Pa. 1982). “§ 1003 (b); Section 403(a) of the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U.S.C. § 2014 (a); and the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
Ronald J. Roche v. United States Postal Serv., 828 F.2d 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1987). “38 U.S.C. § 2014 (b)(1)(D) (Supp. III 1985); 5 C.”
Robert Warren v. Dep't of the Army, 867 F.2d 1156 (8th Cir. 1989). “Warren is a black male who was employed by the Department of the Army as a temporary booking and binding clerk under the Veterans Readjustment Act, 38 U.S.C. § 2014 . Fired after eight months on the job, he subsequently filed charges of race and sex discrimination against the…”
Daniel J. Miller, Jr. v. United States of Am. & Dep't of the Army, 753 F.2d 270 (3rd Cir. 1985). “The Army acted after discovering that Miller’s college degree rendered him overqualified for that position under 38 U.S.C. § 2014 (1976); it refused to request a variance from government regulations that would have permitted Miller to retain his job.”
Michael R. McCauley v. Kenneth J. Thygerson, President, Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., 732 F.2d 978 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “V 1981) (Title VII); 38 U.S.C. § 2014 (c) (1976 & Supp. V 1981) (Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974); 29 U.”
Daniel J. Miller, Jr. v. United States of Am. & Dep't of the Army, 717 F.2d 109 (3rd Cir. 1983). “The Army did so after discovering that Miller’s college degree rendered him overqualified for that position under 38 U.S.C. § 2014 (1976). Miller appealed the discharge to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), which dismissed his appeal on jurisdictional grounds.”
Guillermo Collaso, Jr. v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 775 F.2d 296 (Fed. Cir. 1985). “The VRA, as amended, 38 U.S.C. § 2014 , extends (up to September 30, 1986) to “veterans of the Vietnam era” eligibility to veterans readjustment appointments with the federal government.”
Sipes v. United States, 744 F.2d 1418 (10th Cir. 1984). “Plaintiff’s reliance on the goals behind the Vietnam Veterans’ Readjustment Act, see Appellant’s Brief 13-16 (citing 38 U.S.C. § 2014 , Executive Order 11521, and Manual ch.”
Eddie Jakes v. Vets. Admin., 793 F.2d 293 (Fed. Cir. 1986). “” 38 U.S.C. § 2014 (a) (1982). In other words, Vietnam veterans were to be provided job opportunities which, because of lack of training and education, might not otherwise be available.”
Fahy v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 470 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “§ 3302 note at 525-26 (1982); and 38 U.S.C. § 2014 (1982). Regulations governing these appointments appear in Part 307 of Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”
Renard v. New Cumberland Army Depot, United States Army, 533 F. Supp. 451 (M.D. Penn. 1982). “1 Plaintiff received a veterans read *453 justment appointment from defendant pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 2014 and 5 C.F.R. § 307.101 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.