38 U.S.C. § 2021
Homeless veterans reintegration programs
The Native American Housing Assistance and Self Determination Act of 1996, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), is Pub. L. 104–330,
The date of the enactment of the Joseph Maxwell Cleland and Robert Joseph Dole Memorial Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of 2022, referred to in subsecs. (b)(2), (g)(1), and (h)(2), is the date of enactment of div. U of Pub. L. 117–328, which was approved
A prior section 2021 was renumbered section 4301 of this title and subsequently omitted in the general amendment of chapter 43 of this title by Pub. L. 103–353, § 2(a),
2022—Pub. L. 117–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to homeless veterans reintegration programs and authorized appropriations to carry out this section.
Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 117–180 substituted “2024” for “2022”.
2021—Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 116–315 substituted “section 2023(d)” for “section 2023(e)”.
2020—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 116–159 substituted “2022” for “2020”.
2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–407 substituted “reintegration into the labor force of—” for “reintegration of homeless veterans into the labor force.” and added pars. (1) to (5).
Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 115–251 substituted “2020” for “2018”.
2017—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 115–62 substituted “2018” for “2017”.
2016—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 114–228 substituted “2017” for “2016”.
2015—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 114–58 substituted “2016” for “2015”.
2014—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 113–175 substituted “2015” for “2014”.
2013—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 113–37 substituted “2014” for “2013”.
2012—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 112–154 substituted “2013” for “2012”.
2011—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 112–37 substituted “2012” for “2011”.
2010—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 111–275 substituted “2011” for “2009”.
2006—Subsec. (e)(1)(F). Pub. L. 109–233 added subpar. (F).
Amendment by Pub. L. 113–37 effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 222
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1975–2023 · leading case: Monroe v. Stand. Oil Co., 452 U.S. 549 (1981).
Monroe v. Stand. Oil Co., 452 U.S. 549 (1981). “The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded that 38 U. S. C. § 2021 (b) (3), a provision of the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, does not require an employer to provide preferential scheduling of work hours for an employee who must be absent…”
Samuel C. Hanna, Cross-Appellee v. Am. Motors Corp., Cross-Appellant, 724 F.2d 1300 (7th Cir. 1984). “56, for the period between April 24, 1973, and November 14, 1977.”
William M. Gummo v. Vill. of Depew, New York, 75 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 1996). “Elfvin, Judge, dismissing his complaint alleging that the Village terminated his employment in violation of the Veterans’ Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. § 2021 et seq. (1988) (current version at 38 U.”
John W. Farries v. Stanadyne/chicago Div., 832 F.2d 374 (7th Cir. 1987). “On March 30, 1983, Farries filed an action alleging that he had been unlawfully denied reinstatement pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 2021 . On June 20,1983, Stanadyne made a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on grounds of improper venue and…”
Coffy v. Repub. Steel Corp., 447 U.S. 191 (1980). “The Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U. S. C. § 2021 et seq., provides that any person who leaves a permanent job to enter the military, satisfactorily completes military service, and applies for re-employment within 90 days of being discharged from…”
Dolores Tarin v. Cnty. of Los Angeles Robert C. Gates, Irwin Silberman, Dr., 123 F.3d 1259 (9th Cir. 1997). “; (2) retaliation for filing administrative claims under the same three statutes; and (3) violation of veterans reemployment rights under the Veterans’ Reemployment Rights Act (“VRRA”), 38 U.S.C. §§ 2021 (b)(3) and 2024(b)(2), and Cal.”
King v. St. Vincent's Hosp., 502 U.S. 215 (1991). “Vincent’s might cite § 2024(g), providing reservists ordered to active duty for not more than 90 days with a guarantee of reemployment extending through their period of duty.”
Davis v. Halifax Cnty. Sch. Sys., 508 F. Supp. 966 (E.D.N.C. 1981). “This action arises under the reemployment provisions of the Viet Nam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 2021 , et seq. Plaintiff, a veteran of the United States Army, was employed as a teacher by defendant school system from November 26, 1973, until the end…”
Weyenberg Shoe Mfg. Co. v. Seidl, 410 N.W.2d 604 (Wis. Ct. App. 1987). “INTRODUCTION This case is unique because it was tried on a state theory of wrongful discharge following dismissal by the trial court of Seidl’s federal cause of action.”
Brian S. Leib v. Georgia-Pac. Corp., 925 F.2d 240 (8th Cir. 1991). “Brian Leib appeals from the district court’s summary dismissal of his action under the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U.S.C. §§ 2021 et seq. The district court granted Georgia-Pacific Corporation’s motion for summary judgment, holding as a matter…”
Richard R. Burkart v. Post-Browning, Inc., 859 F.2d 1245 (6th Cir. 1988). “Plaintiff Richard Burkart appeals a summary judgment of the district court in favor of defendant Post-Browning in Bur-kart’s suit for damages for unlawful termination of his employment brought pursuant to section 404(a) of the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of…”
Kempfer v. Automated Finishing, Inc., 564 N.W.2d 692 (Wis. 1997). “The court of appeals instead upheld the jury's award of damages based on a finding that the plaintiff had been discharged in violation of the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act, 38 U.S.C. § 2021 (b)(3) (1982). Kempfer contends that the Weyenberg decision is…”
— 38 U.S.C. § 2021(b)(3) — 3 cases
Charles R. Fernandez v. Dep't of the Army, 234 F.3d 553 (Fed. Cir. 2000).
Kenneth M. Allen v. United States Postal Serv., 142 F.3d 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
Boyle v. Bd. of Police Com'rs of City of Portsmouth, 717 F. Supp. 23 (D.N.H. 1989).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.