38 U.S.C. § 5124
Acceptance of claimant’s statement as proof of relationship
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1996–2021 · leading case: Skoczen v. Shinseki, 564 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
Skoczen v. Shinseki, 564 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “Additionally, 38 U.S.C. § 5124 authorizes VA to accept the claimant’s statement — as opposed to some independent documentation — “as proof of the existence of any relationship” relating to the claim, such as marriage, dissolution of a marriage, birth of a child, and death of any…”
Colon v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 104 (Vet. App. 1996). “205 (1995) (proof of marriage); see also 38 U.S.C. § 5124 (Secretary may accept written statement of claimant as proof of existence of marriage).”
Jones v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 558 (Vet. App. 1996). “Additionally, 38 U.S.C. § 5124 (enacted Nov. 2, 1994) provides, “[T]he Secretary may accept the written statement of a claimant as proof of the existence” of a marriage.”
Dippel v. West, 12 Vet. App. 466 (Vet. App. 1999). “558, 562 (1996) (holding that on remand Board must apply new statutory provision, 38 U.S.C. § 5124 , regarding acceptance of claimant’s statement as proof of spousal relationship, that was enacted while appeal was pending), rev’d on other grounds sub nom.”
191107-45079 (Board of Vet. App. 2019). “38 U.S.C. § 5124 ; 38 C.F.R. § 3.204 . In this case, the Veteran’s spouse, G.”
190918-31480 (Board of Vet. App. 2020). “38 U.S.C. § 5124 ; 38 C.F.R. § 3.204 . Regardless of the regulation governing effective dates of awards, payment of monetary benefits based on compensation begins the first day of the month following the effective date.”
210405-150685 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). “38 U.S.C. § 5124 ; 38 C.F.R. § 3.204 . The Veteran has been rated for his combined service-connected disabilities at a rating in excess of 30 percent (specifically, 40 percent), effective December 9, 2009.”
190820-79694 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). “38 U.S.C. § 5124 ; 38 C.F.R. § 3.204 . The Board finds that the preponderance of the evidence is against granting the Veteran’s claim of entitlement to an earlier effective date than April 9, 2019 for the addition of dependency benefits for his spouse.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.