38 U.S.C. § 515
Administrative settlement of tort claims
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 224 and 236 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, § 2(a).
Pub. L. 116–315, title VII, § 7010,
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1928–1948 · leading case: United States ex rel. Lyons v. Hines, 103 F.2d 737 (D.C. Cir. 1939).
United States ex rel. Lyons v. Hines, 103 F.2d 737 (D.C. Cir. 1939). “304 of the Act, 38 U.S.C.A. § 515 , after a medical examination to which the veteran objected, but the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs refused to reinstate the total disability provision, stating that the veteran was not then in good health, and that the total disability…”
United States v. Golden, 34 F.2d 367 (10th Cir. 1929). “” 38 USCA § 515. Moreover, in that case, the applicant made an affirmative false statement as to his condition.”
Jones v. United States, 106 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1939). “The deceit was not rendered harmless by the provisions of law found in 38 U.S.C.A. § 515 , permitting a reinstatement when the applicant is not in good health if his “disability is the result of an injury or disease, or of an aggravation thereof, suffered in the active military…”
United States v. Sellers, 75 F.2d 623 (5th Cir. 1935). “only as they consent to be; that consent to be sued concerning benefits to veterans is found only in section 19 of the World War Veterans’ Act (as amended July 3, 1930, 38 USCA § 445), in the words, “In the event of disagreement as to claim, including claim for refund of…”
Moskowitz v. United States, 145 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1944). “The insurance lapsed and was reinstated under Section 304 of the World War Veterans’ Act, as amended, 38 U.S.C.A. § 515 , and the unpaid premiums were charged as an interest bearing indebtedness against the insurance.”
Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 124 F.2d 743 (7th Cir. 1941). “The gist of the Government’s argument is that Section 305, by preventing a lapse of insurance, does no more for the Veteran and his .”
Beehler v. United States, 40 F.2d 313 (6th Cir. 1930). “625 , 1310), (38 USCA § 515), appellant had a right to reinstate the policy, provided he could bring himself within its provisions.”
United States v. Moskowitz, 170 F.2d 870 (5th Cir. 1948). “In January 1928, this application was accepted subject to provisions of the World War Veterans’ Act, as amended, § 304, 38 U.S.C.A. § 515 ; and, when the conditions were complied with, the insured received the policy (a thirty-year monthly payment converted United States…”
United States v. Kaminsky, 64 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1933). “” 38 USCA § 515. The quoted requirement is additional evidence that the lawmakers, in providing for insurance against total permanent disability, had in mind only such disability as might occur after the insured entered the service, and not a total permanent disability which…”
Stevens v. United States, 29 F.2d 904 (8th Cir. 1928). “” This section has since become section 304 of the World War Veterans’ Act of 1924 (38 USCA § 515). Plaintiff in error testifies that he was advised by the Bureau to reinstate his insurance for the reason that if anything happened to him his wife and children would get no…”
United States v. Stevens, 64 F.2d 853 (8th Cir. 1933). “625 [38 USCA § 515]), and amendments thereto, were of the same general character and terms as the original contract, and that no formal policies of reinstatement were issued.”
United States v. Riggins, 65 F.2d 750 (9th Cir. 1933). “790 , 799, § 15 [38 USCA § 515]). He neither made these payments nor sought to have them converted into a loan as therein provided.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.