39 U.S.C. § 205
Procedures of the Board of Governors
Subsecs. (a) and (d) effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1982–1991 · leading case: Bernard L. Silver, Cartwright-Mitchell, Inc., a Delaware Corp. v. United States Postal Serv., 951 F.2d 1033 (9th Cir. 1991).
Bernard L. Silver, Cartwright-Mitchell, Inc., a Delaware Corp. v. United States Postal Serv., 951 F.2d 1033 (9th Cir. 1991). “39 U.S.C. § 205 (c)(1). The GOVERNORS and the PG jointly appoint and have the joint power to remove the Deputy Postmaster General (“DPG”).”
Paul N. Carlin v. John R. McKean Individually & as a Member of the Bd. of Governors of the U.S. Postal Serv., 823 F.2d 620 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “He argues that this removal by a minority of the Governors does not comply with the governing statute, see 39 U.S.C. § 205 (c)(1) (1982), and that this court can review his removal for failure to satisfy that requirement.”
Hill, Christopher & Phillips, P. C. v. United States Postal Serv., 535 F. Supp. 804 (D.D.C. 1982). “39 U.S.C. § 205 (d) (1976). 11 . It is also interesting to note that the IRS and the Postal Service as the Governmental entities principally affected by this interpretation, concur in it.”
Friedlander v. United States Postal Serv., 658 F. Supp. 95 (D.D.C. 1987). “§ 401 (9); and, the members of its Board of *101 Governors are officers of the United States Government, 39 U.S.C. § 205 (d). 11 . As one court has noted, it is reasonable to assume that in expressing its intent through the Postal Reorganization Act, Congress sought clarity, not…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.