39 U.S.C. § 3011
Judicial enforcement
1999—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 106–168 substituted “3007” for “3006, 3007,”.
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–168 effective 120 days after
Section effective first day of sixth month which begins after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1971–2007 · leading case: Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 (1974).
Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 (1974). “See 39 U. S. C. § 3011 (e). IV Petitioners' final contentions are directed at alleged procedural irregularities said to have occurred during the course of the trial.”
United States v. Hyman C. Slepicoff, D/B/A Graduate Enter., 524 F.2d 1244 (5th Cir. 1975). “39 U.S.C. § 3011 . Therefore, the district court’s exclusion of this evidence was proper.”
Bernas v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 215 F. App'x 64 (2d Cir. 2007). “See 39 U.S.C. § 3011 . Unless some statute authorizes a general private right of action to enforce FCC regulations, there is none.”
Pent-R-Books, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 328 F. Supp. 297 (E.D.N.Y 1971). “Provision for judicial enforcement of this statute is contained in 39 U.S.C. § 3011 , which authorizes the Attorney General to commence a civil action in a district court for an injunction on request of the Postal Service.”
John J. Leonard v. United States Postal Serv., Appeal of United States of Am., 489 F.2d 814 (1st Cir. 1974). “§ 3008 authorizes the Service to request the Attorney General to seek a district court order directing compliance with a Postal Service order prohibiting mailing of offensive matter to particular addressees, and 39 U.S.C. § 3011 provides that the Service “may request” the…”
United States v. Treatman, 408 F. Supp. 944 (C.D. Cal. 1976). “Where a mailer has been found by a court to have violated § 3010, by sending such material to any person whose name has appeared on the list for at least 30 days, 39 U.S.C. § 3011 authorizes a district court to issue against the mailer various types of injunctive relief which…”
United States v. Toushin, 714 F. Supp. 1452 (M.D. Tenn. 1989). “§ 3010 is for the Postal Service to request that the Attorney General institute a civil action against the sender pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3011 . The district court, upon finding a violation of 39 U.”
United States v. Treatman, 399 F. Supp. 258 (W.D. La. 1975). “3010 requires a person who mails or causes to be mailed any sexually oriented advertisement to mark the envelope as containing such and place his name on the envelope, and that people who desire not to receive such matter may place their names on a list maintained by the post…”
Constitutionality of Legislation Prohibiting the Mailing of Sexually Oriented Advertisements (OLC 1984). “1976), holding that enjoining a mailer from sending sexually ori ented advertisements to anyone who has not affirmatively requested the mate rial as a remedy under 39 U.S.C. § 3011 would be unconstitutional.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.