39 U.S.C. § 3212
Congressional Record under frank of Members of Congress
1973—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 93–191 incorporated existing text in provisions designated as subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 93–191 incorporated existing text in provisions designated as subsec. (b), authorized sending, as franked mail, reprints of parts of Congressional Record, and authorized the mailing of Congressional Record if the listed matter is mailable as franked mail under section 3210 of this title.
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–191 effective
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1972–1974 · leading case: Bowie v. Williams, 351 F. Supp. 628 (E.D. Pa. 1972).
Bowie v. Williams, 351 F. Supp. 628 (E.D. Pa. 1972). “” Thus, plaintiffs claim that distribution cannot be made within the terms of 39 U.S.C. § 3212 , which allows a member of Congress to mail any portion of the Congressional Record under his frank.”
Alfred D. Schiaffo, in No. 72-2168 v. Henry Helstoski, in No. 72-2167, 492 F.2d 413 (3rd Cir. 1974). “Applying 39 U.S.C. §§ 3212 , the court found the distribution of the first portion of materials in Group III permissible, but enjoined the second.”
Schiaffo v. Helstoski, 350 F. Supp. 1076 (D.N.J. 1972). “” I find nothing in the legislative history which prohibits the defendant from copying matter that appears in the Congressional Record, printing it at his own expense, and distributing it under his frank.”
Levy v. Abzug, 355 F. Supp. 1299 (S.D.N.Y. 1972). “The mailing was therefore authorized under 39 U.S.C. § 3212 which provides that— “Members of Congress may send as franked mail the Congressional Record, or any part thereof, or speeches or reports therein contained.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.