If Congress fails to appropriate an amount authorized under section 2401(c) of this title for any class of mail sent free of postage under section 3217 or 3403–3406 11 So in original. Probably should be followed by “of this title,”. the rate for that class may be adjusted in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter so that the increased revenues received from the users of such class will equal the amount for that class that the Congress was to appropriate.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases, 1972–1983 · leading case:
Greenberg v. Bolger, 497 F. Supp. 756 (E.D.N.Y. 1980).
Greenberg v. Bolger, 497 F. Supp. 756 (E.D.N.Y. 1980).
· cites it 2× “39 U.S.C. § 3627 . Plaintiff political committees, together with twenty-four other “new” political committees, were informed by letter that, as of December 16,1979, they would no longer be entitled to the special mailing rate.”
Direct Mail/Mktg. Ass'n, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 501 F.2d 717 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
· cites it 2× “That is, we must determine whether Congress’ appropriations action evinced an intent to ratify the inter-rate discrepancy pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3627 . DMMA insists that Congress’ action was ambiguous on this point.”
Spencer v. Herdesty, 571 F. Supp. 444 (S.D. Ohio 1983).
· cites it 2× “39 U.S.C. § 3627 . The history of this statute and the statutory scheme of which it is a party have been thoroughly addressed elsewhere and need not be reiterated here.”
Ass'n of Am. Publishers, Inc. v. Governors of the United States Postal Serv., 485 F.2d 768 (D.C. Cir. 1973).
“But the reason the Governors, like the Commission, gave for ignoring the “phasing” and making the increase immediate in its total impact was that this is what Congress directed should be *405 the result in a situation where Congress had failed to appropriate funds within the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.