39 U.S.C. § 3627
Adjusting free rates
If Congress fails to appropriate an amount authorized under section 2401(c) of this title for any class of mail sent free of postage under section 3217 or 3403–3406 1
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1972–1983 · leading case: Greenberg v. Bolger, 497 F. Supp. 756 (E.D.N.Y 1980).
Greenberg v. Bolger, 497 F. Supp. 756 (E.D.N.Y 1980). “39 U.S.C. § 3627 . Plaintiff political committees, together with twenty-four other “new” political committees, were informed by letter that, as of December 16,1979, they would no longer be entitled to the special mailing rate.”
Direct Mail/Mktg. Ass'n, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 501 F.2d 717 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “That is, we must determine whether Congress’ appropriations action evinced an intent to ratify the inter-rate discrepancy pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3627 . DMMA insists that Congress’ action was ambiguous on this point.”
Spencer v. Herdesty, 571 F. Supp. 444 (S.D. Ohio 1983). “39 U.S.C. § 3627 . The history of this statute and the statutory scheme of which it is a party have been thoroughly addressed elsewhere and need not be reiterated here.”
Ass'n of Am. Publishers, Inc. v. Governors of the United States Postal Serv., 485 F.2d 768 (D.C. Cir. 1973). “But the reason the Governors, like the Commission, gave for ignoring the “phasing” and making the increase immediate in its total impact was that this is what Congress directed should be *405 the result in a situation where Congress had failed to appropriate funds within the…”
Direct Mail Advert. Ass'n, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 458 F.2d 813 (D.C. Cir. 1972). “39 U.S.C. § 3627 provides : § 3627. Adjusting free and reduced rates.”
Constitutionality of Affording Reduced Postal Rates to Committees of the Major Political Parties (OLC 1980). “January 4, 1980 M EM ORANDUM OPINION FOR TH E POSTM ASTER G EN ER A L This responds to your letter to the Attorney General asking our advice concerning whether there is a failure of appropriations in FY 1980 for special third-class rates for political committees other than those…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.