U.S. Code » Title 39 » Part PART IV— MAIL MATTER › Chapter CHAPTER 36— POSTAL RATES, CLASSES, AND SERVICES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— PROVISIONS RELATING TO MARKET-DOMINANT PRODUCTS

39 U.S.C. § 3628

Repealed. Pub. L. 109–435, title II, § 201(b), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3205]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 39 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 43 cases, 1973–2004 · leading case: Nat'l Ass'n of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Serv., 569 F.2d 570 (D.C. Cir. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Ass'n of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Serv., 569 F.2d 570 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 7× “13 In addition, if upon judicial review of a decision of the Governors on permanent rates, taken pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3628 , the court “orders a matter returned to the Commission for further consideration, the *338 Postal Service, with the consent of the Commission, may place…”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 524 F. Supp. 1235 (D. Del. 1981). · cites it 7× “return the recommended decision to the Commission for reconsideration and a further recommended decision which would then be retransmitted to the Governors for further action and subject to judicial review in accordance with 39 U.S.C. § 3628 . 3 3. Reject the recommended…”
Combined Commc'ns Corp. Nashville Banner Publ'g Co., Cross-Appellees v. United States Postal Serv., Cross-Appellant, 891 F.2d 1221 (6th Cir. 1989). · cites it 9× “See 39 U.S.C. § 3628 . On December 27, 1984, Advo-System Inc.”
Reader's Digest Ass'n v. United States Postal Serv., 501 F. Supp. 126 (D.D.C. 1980). · cites it 4× “4 Plaintiff shortly thereafter petitioned the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals for review of the Governor’s decision pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3628 . Intervenors also sought review in filings with the Second and Third Circuits.”
Newsweek, Inc. & Time, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., Magazine Publishers Ass'n, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 652 F.2d 239 (2d Cir. 1981). · cites it 3× “Under § 3628 of the Act, 39 U.S.C. § 3628 , a decision of the Governors “may be appealed to any court of appeals of the United States, within 15 days after its publication by the Public Printer, by an aggrieved party who appeared in the proceedings under section 3624(a) of this…”
Ass'n of Am. Publishers, Inc. v. Governors of the United States Postal Serv., 485 F.2d 768 (D.C. Cir. 1973). · cites it 3× “WYZANSKI, Senior District Judge: In these two actions, brought on the basis of the original jurisdiction conferred on this court by Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, 39 U.S.C. § 3628 , Association of American Publishers, Inc.”
Mail Order Ass'n of Am. v. United States Postal Serv., 2 F.3d 408 (D.C. Cir. 1993). · cites it 5× “” 39 U.S.C. § 3628 ; see also Newsweek, 663 F.”
Nicholas J. Janakes, on Behalf of Himself & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Postal Serv., 768 F.2d 1091 (9th Cir. 1985). “§ 409 (a), which provides that except for appeals to the courts of appeal from certain rate decisions, see 39 U.S.C. § 3628 , “the United States district courts shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction over all actions brought by or against the Postal Service.”
Time, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 685 F.2d 760 (2d Cir. 1982). · cites it 6× “The Board’s order allowing the rates to take effect under protest constituted a decision reviewable by “any court of appeals of the United States,” 39 U.S.C. § 3628 , and this Court was ultimately asked to scrutinize the new rates in Newsweek.”
Combined Commc'ns Corp. v. United States Postal Serv., 686 F. Supp. 663 (M.D. Tenn. 1988). · cites it 4× “39 U.S.C. § 3628 . “No [other] court [has] jurisdiction to review a decision made by the [PRC] or Governors under [chapter 36 of the Act].”
Mail Order Ass'n of Am. v. United States Postal Serv., No. 91-1058, 986 F.2d 509 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “39 U.S.C. § 3628 . See Association of American Publishers v.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Serv., 607 F.2d 392 (D.C. Cir. 1979). “The section of the Act providing for judicial review, 39 U.S.C. § 3628 (1976), also declares: “The court may affirm the decision or order that the entire matter be returned for further consideration, but the court may not modify the decision.”
Show all 43 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.